Cómo citar: Guilbaud, M.-N., Hernández-Jiménez, A., Siebe, C., Salinas, S., 2021, Las Cabras volcano, Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field, México: Topographic, climatic, and shallow magmatic controls on scoria cone eruptions: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, v. 38, núm. 2, p. 101-121.
REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS GEOLÓGICAS
v. 38, núm. 2,
2021, p. 101-121
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/cgeo.20072902e.2021.2.1645
Las Cabras volcano, Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic
Field, México: Topographic, climatic, and shallow magmatic controls on scoria
cone eruptions
Volcán Las Cabras, Campo Volcánico Michoacán
Guanajuato, México: controles topográfico, climático y magmáticos superficiales
en erupciones de conos de escoria
Marie-Noëlle Guilbaud1,*, Athziri Hernández-Jiménez2, Claus Siebe1, and Sergio Salinas3
1 Departamento de Vulcanología, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510 Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico.
2 Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510
Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico.
3 Facultad de Ingeniería,
División de Ingeniería en Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Nacional Autónoma
de México, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510 Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico.
* marie@igeofisica.unam.mx
ABSTRACT
Scoria cones are
abundant in most volcanic fields on Earth, such as the Michoacán-Guanajuato
Volcanic Field, in the central-western sector of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic
Belt. However, there are few in-depth studies on their eruptive style and
controlling factors, despite of their diversity in shape and composition which
implies a wide range of hazards. Here, we present results of morphologic,
stratigraphic, sedimentary, petrographic, and geochemical studies of the
prominent Las Cabras scoria cone located west of the Zacapu lacustrine basin in
the center of the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field. This basaltic andesitic
to andesitic volcano formed between 27 and 26 kyrs BP on the steep slopes
(>10º) of the lava shield of El Tule volcano. Over time, its dominant
eruptive style changed from Strombolian to effusive. Initial explosive activity
built a 170-m-high scoria cone and deposited thick tephra fallout on the surrounding
sloping terrain. Structures in the deposits indicate that early friable
fine-grained tephra underwent significant erosion due to syn-eruptive heavy
rain coupled with the sloping nature of the underlying ground. This erosion
generated lahars that very likely reached the Zacapu lake based on the
pre-eruptive topography. As the explosivity dropped, lava was emitted from the
base of the cone first to the S and SE, forming a thick, viscous lobe that
filled a pre-existing E-W valley. The flow direction then deviated to the N and
NE, to form thinner, less-viscous lobes fed from the vent by an open-channel.
The lavas are covered by hummocks made of agglutinates and bombs that indicate
that the eruption terminated by catastrophic collapse of the SE sector of the
cone, possibly triggered by the intrusion of magma within the cone, which
destabilized its downslope segment. The sudden flank failure was potentially
associated with a late effusive event and the hummocks may have been carried
away by the lava surge. Whole-rock chemical variations and crystal
disequilibrium textures point toward a complex magma feeding system, involving
mixing and mingling between different magma batches. This study shows that the
formation of scoria cones on a terrain with a marked slope (>10°) has
profound impacts on the eruption dynamics and related hazards due to its effect
on cone stability and ash erosion. It also evidences the erosive effect of
syn-eruptive rain on fine-grained tephra, especially when deposited on a slope.
Finally, it reveals the complex magmatic processes that may occur in the
shallow plumbing system of monogenetic andesitic volcanoes, which could be
particularly important in inland areas of continental arcs.
Keywords: Monogenetic; scoria cones; slope; tephra; erosion; magma
mixing; Mexico.
RESUMEN
Los conos de escoria
abundan en la mayoría de los campos volcánicos de la Tierra y en particular en
el campo volcánico Michoacán-Guanajuato, ubicado en el sector centro-occidental
del Cinturón Volcánico Trans-Mexicano. Sin embargo, existen pocos estudios
detallados de sus estilos eruptivos y los factores que los controlan, a pesar
de su diversidad en formas y composiciones. En este documento presentamos el
resultado de estudios morfológicos, cartográficos, estratigráficos,
sedimentológicos, petrográficos y geoquímicos del cono de escoria Las Cabras
localizado al oeste de la cuenca lacustre de Zacapu en el centro del campo
volcánico Michoacán-Guanajuato. La erupción de este volcán basalto-andesítico a
andesítico tuvo lugar durante un periodo breve entre 27 y 26 mil años AP en la
base inclinada del escudo de lavas del volcán El Tule. Con el tiempo, su estilo
eruptivo cambió de Estromboliano a efusivo. La actividad explosiva temprana
construyó un cono de escoria de 170 m
de altura y depositó tefra
de caída en las pendientes del terreno circundante. Las estructuras
sedimentarias de los depósitos indican que la tefra temprana sufrió una erosión
significativa debido a lluvias intensas y a su granulometría fina, así como a
la pendiente del terreno. Cuando el nivel de explosividad disminuyó, la lava
fue emitida desde la base del cono, primero hacia el sur y sureste, formando un
espeso lóbulo de lava viscosa que rellenó un valle pre-existente, mismo que
desembocaba hacia el lago de Zacapu. La dirección principal del flujo de lava
cambió después hacia el norte y noreste, para formar lóbulos menos viscosos
alimentados desde la ventila por medio de un canal abierto. Las lavas están
cubiertas de montículos constituidos por aglutinados y bombas que indican que
la erupción terminó con un colapso catastrófico de una cuarta parte del cono
hacia el este, posiblemente disparado por la intrusión de lava dentro del cono,
que desestabilizó su segmento orientado cuesta abajo. La falla súbita del
flanco estuvo posiblemente asociada a un evento efusivo tardío y los montículos
pueden haber sido transportados por el surgimiento de la lava. A su vez, el
amplio rango composicional de los productos y las texturas de desequilibrio de
los cristales demuestran que ocurrieron procesos complejos en el conducto
magmático, involucrando una mezcla parcial o total entre diferentes lotes de
magma. En conclusión, este estudio demuestra que la formación de conos de
escoria sobre una pendiente pronunciada (>10°) influye fuertemente en la
dinámica eruptiva y los peligros asociados. También, evidencia el efecto
erosivo de la lluvia sobre ceniza fina recién depositada en una pendiente.
Finalmente, revela los procesos complejos que ocurren en el sistema magmático
somero de los volcanes monogenéticos andesíticos, en particular en un contexto
tectónico de arco continental.
Palabras clave: Volcanismo
monogenético; estilo eruptivo; campo volcánico Michoacán-Guanajuato; tefra,
erosión; mezcla de magmas; México.
Manuscript received: march 4, 2021
Corrected manuscript received: june 10, 2021
Manuscript accepted: june 14, 2021
INTRODUCTION
Until about twenty years ago, research in volcanology had traditionally
focused on large active polygenetic volcanoes and high-magnitude eruptions,
while small monogenetic volcanoes such as scoria cones were relatively
neglected. This is mostly because of their small size and simple morphology
that suggested both short-lived, simple magmatic systems with hence low
scientific interest (“boring”), and low-magnitude eruptions with limited
impacts and hence low concern for hazard assessments. However, there is
increasing evidence that scoria cones can feed strong explosive activity, with
far-distance impacts (Martin and Németh, 2006; Mannen and Ito, 2007; Pioli et al., 2008; Di Traglia et al., 2009; Lorenzo-Merino et al., 2018). Moreover, even local
and regional-scale hazards cannot be neglected in a highly populated world, and
detailed studies of scoria cones are crucial to estimate volcanic hazards in
urban areas across the globe (e.g., Siebe and Macías, 2006; Houghton et al., 2006; Ort et al., 2008; Murcia et al., 2015; Hopkins et al., 2020). These small volcanoes
also hold clues about fundamental processes such as the origin and evolution
during transport of mantle-derived magmas, as they undergo limited
differentiation and crustal contamination (e.g., Agustín-Flores et al., 2011; Rasoazanamparany et al., 2016; Jankovics et al., 2019; Larrea et al., 2017; 2019a; 2021; Albert et al., 2020; Ramírez-Uribe et al., 2021). In addition, they
conserve information on shallow-level magma degassing and crystallization
(Taddeucci et al., 2004; Pioli et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2008; Riggs and Duffield, 2008), and their activity is strongly linked
and hence indicative of structural controls on magma ascent (Settle, 1979;
Takada, 1994; Tibaldi, 1995; Connor, 1990; Valentine and Keating, 2007;
Valentine and Gregg, 2008; Osorio-Ocampo et al., 2018; Gómez-Vasconcelos et al., 2021). What has received
comparatively less attention is their strong interaction with climatic
conditions (such as torrential rain; Segerstrom 1950), the pre-eruptive and
syn-eruptive topography (Németh et al., 2011; Kereszturi et al. 2012; Becerril et al., 2021), and the upper-crust composition (including the occurrence of
magma bodies, such as sills or dikes), which will be illustrated here using the
case of Las Cabras volcano in Michoacán, Mexico (Figure
1).
Figure 1. Location of Las Cabras
volcano (orange triangle) in the Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field and the
Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The green square locates the map in Figure 2. The
location of historic Jorullo and Paricutin volcanoes is indicated (purple
triangles and line, respectively). Empty triangles mark the main
stratovolcanoes (from west to east: SP: San Pedro, CE: Ceboruco, T: Tequila,
FC: Fuego de Colima, NT: Nevado de Toluca, I: Iztaccíhuatl, P: Popocatépetl,
LM: La Malinche, PO: Pico de Orizaba, CP: Cofre de Perote), and the major
faults are also shown.
The Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) is a ~1000 km long active
continental arc related to the subduction of the Rivera and Cocos Plates below
North America (Figure 1). Scoria cones and other monogenetic vents are abundant
along the TMVB and form large fields, the largest of these being the
Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field, hereafter referred to as MGVF (Figure 1;
Hasenaka and Carmichael, 1985; Connor, 1990). The MGVF includes >1100
small-to-medium sized Quaternary volcanic edifices, at least 20 of which formed
in the Holocene (Hasenaka and Carmichael, 1985; Guilbaud et al., 2009; 2011; 2012; Chevrel et al., 2016; Mahgoub et al., 2017; Osorio-Ocampo et al., 2018; Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018; 2021; Ramírez-Uribe et al., 2019; Larrea et al., 2019b; Macías and Arce,
2019). These studies report that volcanoes in the MGVF are dominantly scoria
cones with lava flows and medium-sized shields, with some viscous flows without
cones at source, domes, and rare maars. Seismic swarms were recorded in the
field in February-March 1997 (Pacheco et al., 1999), May-July 2006 (Gardine et al., 2011), and January-February
2020 (SSN, 2020), probably recording episodes of dike injection and stalling in
the crust (e.g., Albert et al., 2016). Hence, a new eruption is likely to happen in the coming decades
in the MGVF, further stressing the need for a deep understanding of volcanic
activity in this area (Guilbaud et al., 2012).
Historical documents and detailed petrographical and geochemical studies
of the historic Jorullo (1759–1774) and Paricutin (1943–1952) volcanoes located
in the south part of the MGVF (Figure 1) have provided a wealth of information
about the dynamics of scoria cone eruptions (e.g., Ordóñez, 1947; Luhr and
Simkin, 1993; Guilbaud et al., 2009; Pioli et al., 2008; 2009; Rowland et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2010; Rasoazanamparany et al., 2016; Larrea et al., 2017; 2019a; 2021). Both started with strong explosive,
violent-Strombolian phases, driven by high magma discharge rates and high magma
viscosity (Pioli et al., 2008; Rowland et al., 2009). Later-on, explosive and effusive activity occurred
simultaneously at both volcanoes (Luhr and Simkin, 1993), possibly due to
magma-gas decoupling in a complex plumbing system underneath the cones
(Krauskopf, 1948; Pioli et al., 2009). The magma emitted at the vent became more differentiated with
time during these two eruptions, which was ascribed initially to assimilation
and fractional crystallization in a magma chamber (Luhr and Carmichael, 1985;
McBirney et al., 1987). Yet, more recent isotopic data suggest instead the involvement
of distinct magma batches and hence a deep-rooted branching magmatic system
that would extend well below the edifice (Rowe et al., 2011; Rasoazanamparany et al., 2016; Larrea et al., 2019a). The Jorullo and
Paricutin eruptions were however somewhat anomalous due to their large volumes
(>1 km3) and it is unclear if these processes also occur during the eruption of
smaller scoria cones. Furthermore, these two eruptions occurred at the southern
margin of the volcanic field, and their eruptive processes may depend on their
setting and hence not apply to other sectors. Therefore, detailed studies of
smaller and hence more common scoria cones that are in inland sectors of the
field are needed to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the eruptive
style and their controlling factors.
Here, we present results from the detailed study of Las Cabras volcano,
a breached scoria cone with several lava lobes located in the central part of
the MGVF (Figure 1) near the margin of a fault-bounded lake basin, and close to
a cluster of Holocene vents (Siebe et al., 2014; Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018). This volcano is morphologically similar to many other young scoria
cones in the MGVF, yet its products display peculiar sedimentary and textural
features that motivated this study. Using field, petrography and geochemical
(major and trace element) data, we show that products from this small volcano
document diverse processes such as magmatic and topographic controls on cone
collapse, shallow-seated magma mingling, and syn-eruptive tephra erosion.
TECTONIC AND
VOLCANIC SETTING
The MGVF occupies a whole segment of the TMVB, spreading across the
entire arc width, which contrasts to other sectors of the belt where young
monogenetic fields are more localized (Figure 1), and makes it of particular
interest to investigate variations in monogenetic activity with space and hence
tectonic setting. It has been proposed that the peculiarities of the MGVF
reflect a low-angle slab subduction, that allows the conditions of mantle
melting to be met over a wide area (Guilbaud et al., 2019). Magmas range from
basaltic to rhyolitic in the MGVF, but most are andesitic (Hasenaka and Carmichael,
1987; Guilbaud et al., 2019). The majority of them have calc-alkaline signatures although
alkaline OIB-types exist and occur throughout the field, probably reflecting
peculiar characteristics of the mantle source (Blatter and Hammersley, 2010;
Losantos et al., 2017; Guilbaud et al., 2019).
Las Cabras volcano is located in the central part of the MGVF, a region marked
by large (5–10 km wide, 10–50 km long) highland depressions bordered by
prominent normal faults. This zone is tectonically active as many of those
faults displace Quaternary products, and some are linked with high-magnitude
(M>5) historical seismic events (Figure 1, see also Suter et al., 1992; 2001;
Gómez-Vasconcelos et al., 2021). Such shallow extensional activity is probably caused by
gravitational collapse of the belt, with some possible influence of slab
rollback (Suter et al., 2001). The tectonic depressions or basins host or have hosted shallow
lakes, many of them were drained in previous centuries for agricultural or
urbanization purposes, including Zacapu lake (Noriega and Noriega, 1923).
More precisely, Las Cabras is located 10 km west of the plain of the
Zacapu basin, an elongated 25 km-long and 10 km-wide depression filled with
lacustrine sediments and intercalated tephra layers (Figure
2). Detailed mapping and radiometric dating conducted during the past 15
years allow to draw a clear picture of the volcanism in this area of the MGVF
(Figure 2). So far, this data has been published for various sectors around the
basin: the SE sector around the Alberca de Guadalupe maar (Kshirsagar et al., 2015), the NW sector around
El Caracol tuff cone (Kshirsagar et al., 2016), the S sector around the Mazcuta cone near the town of Comanja
(Ramírez-Uribe et al., 2019), and the W sector near Zacapu city (Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018; 2021; Mahgoub et al., 2018) (Figure 2). These
studies show that the basin has hosted intense and diverse volcanic activity
since the Pliocene. The oldest volcanoes are the intensely eroded and strongly
faulted shields that crop out mainly to the NE of the basin, dated at one site
at 4.4±0.17 Ma (Kshirsagar et al., 2015). These are followed in age by less-intensely faulted eroded lava
shields, ignimbrite deposits, and lava flows dated at the early-Pleistocene
period (1–2 Ma), and Mid-Pleistocene volcanoes (100 ka–1 Ma) with better
preserved morphologies and no significant faults (Ban et al., 1992; Kshirsagar et al., 2015; Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018). Finally, all of the
above features are partially covered by young Late-Pleistocene to Holocene
volcanoes with pristine morphology that occur all around the basin, but more
particularly to its SW, forming a broad WSW-ENE alignment of vents west of
Zacapu city (Figure 2). This latter area is of particular interest for
assessing volcanic hazards, given the ~77000 inhabitants of the Zacapu
municipality (INEGI, 2020; Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2021). It also hosts
important archaeological sites of interest for constraining the development of
pre-Hispanic civilizations in this formerly densely inhabited region (e.g., Michelet et al., 1989; Migeon, 1998; Arnauld
and Faugère-Kalfon, 1998; Darras et al., 2017; Forest et al., 2019; Pereira et al., 2021).
Figure 2. Geology of the Zacapu basin. a) Geological map constructed with the aid of a 5-m-resolution digital elevation model (DEM), field observations, and published and unpublished geochronological data (Siebe et al., 2014). Rectangles in broken lines indicate areas mapped in detail (Alberca de Guadalupe: Kshirsagar et al., 2015; El Caracol: Kshirsagar et al., 2016; W Zacapu: Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018; Mazcuta near Comanja: Ramírez-Uribe et al., 2019). The legend of the map is shown in lower right. b) DEM showing some of the volcanoes mentioned in the text.
Reyes-Guzmán et al. (2018) present a geological map, radiometric ages, and geochemical and
petrographic data of the western sector of the Zacapu basin that includes Las
Cabras volcano (Figure 2). They report the following: Most volcanoes are
andesitic, accounting for 86 vol.% of the products emitted during the last 2
Ma. Few dacitic volcanoes (4 vol.%) and basaltic trachy-andesites, basaltic
andesites, and rhyolites, were emitted by only one volcano, respectively.
Andesites are porphyritic and contain up to 10 vol.% of phenocrysts that often
show disequilibrium textures such as sieved plagioclases with resorbed margins
and quartz with reaction coronas of augite microlites. The most recent
eruptions (Mahgoub et al., 2018; Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2021) occurred during the Late Holocene, between 1500 BC and
METHODOLOGY
During several field campaigns (2013-2015), products of Las Cabras were
inspected and sampled. A morphological map of the volcano and its surroundings
was made using field observations, satellite images (Google Earth 2020, 2021),
a 5 m-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) constructed with data from
Mexico’s Instituto Nacional de Geografía, Estadística e Informática (codes:
E14A11D1; E14A11D2; E14A11D3; E14A11D4; E14A11E1; E14A11E2; E14A11E3; E14A11E4;
E14A11F1 y E14A11F3, scale: 1:10000; INEGI, 2016), and slope-maps built from
the DEM. ArcMap software was used for calculating lava´s areas and volumes (see
details in Hernández Jiménez, 2016). The volume of the actual cone (the cone in
its present shape), the pre-breaching cone (cone prior to breaching) and the
hummocks (Table 1) was estimated from the
DEM, with the surface difference tool of ArcMap GIS software (“DEM clipping”),
following a condensed version of the methodology presented in Guilbaud et al. (2012), Larrea et al. (2017 and 2019b), and Ramírez-Uribe et al. (2019). This method requires to model the basal plane of the constructs,
drawing contour lines that are consistent with the surrounding relief. For the
actual cone, we used a slightly inclined surface that simulates the continuity
of the slope of El Tule shield below the volcano. For the pre-breached cone, a
circular shape was used to idealize the cone´s dimensions as a symmetric closed
crater cone or ring-shaped cone (Dóniz-Paéz, 2015). The difference between the
actual cone and the pre-breaching cone provided an estimate of the volume of
the breached sector. Finally, to obtain the volume of the hummocks, they were
delineated from their morphology and their base was estimated from the altitude
of the directly-surrounding lava surface. Two digital elevation models were
then obtained (the DEM with hummocks and the DEM without), allowing to extract
the volume of hummocks.
Table 1: Volume estimates for
cone and hummocks made from DEM
Structure |
Type |
Volume (m3) |
Las Cabras |
Actual scoria cone |
74409053 |
Pre-breached cone |
Hypothetic ring-shape cone |
93325667 |
Breach |
Difference between actual and hypothetic cones |
18916615 |
Hummocks |
High hummocks |
11677923 |
Small hummocks |
3211409 |
|
Total |
14889333 |
Exposed stratigraphic sections of the tephra fallout sequence at
different distances from the volcano were studied in the field and samples
collected from the distinct layers were sieved (ϕ -6 to 4) and observed below
the optical microscope in the Laboratorio de Sedimentología Volcánica at the
Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Sedimentary parameters were derived from frequency curves following Folk
(1974). Thin sections of scoria, bomb, and lava samples were made by Mann
Petrographics (New Mexico, USA) and studied below the petrographic microscope
at UNAM. All the thin sections are described in Hernández Jiménez (2016). Modal
analysis was performed for a sub-set of these samples using a point counter
(see Hernández Jiménez, 2016 and Reyes-Guzmán, 2017). Bulk rock geochemical
analyses of major and trace elements of a set of tephra and lava samples were
conducted at Activation Laboratories (Canada), following the procedures
summarized in Guilbaud et al. (2019) and presented in more detail on the webpage of the laboratory.
Prior to plotting, major and minor element data were normalized to 100%, after
converting concentrations in Fe2O3 to FeO using FeO=0.8998*Fe2O3.
RESULTS
Cartography and
morphological analysis
Las Cabras volcano formed on the southern slopes of the El Tule shield,
near its base (Figures 3 and 4). It consists
of a breached scoria cone from which emerged lavas that followed the main
topographic slope along a valley to the east, towards the Zacapu paleolake. The
valley occupied by the flow is limited on its southern side by north-dipping
lavas from El Tecolote shield (Figure 4). El Tule was dated by 40Ar/39Ar at 116±8 ka and El Tecolote
at 2±41 ka, suggesting a Late Pleistocene age for the latter (Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018). The southern proximal
margins of Las Cabras lavas are slightly overlapped by those from El Pueblito,
a younger cone located upslope, while distal lavas are buried under Holocene
lava flows from Mesa Las Víboras, El Capaxtiro, and Las Vigas (Figure 4). El
Pueblito lavas are in turn overlapped by lavas of Mesa La Víbora. Ash from El
Molcajete, a small breached scoria cone to the NE (Figure 3), covers Las Cabras
fallout separated by a paleosol dated at ~17 cal kyrs BP (Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018). Hence, the area
surrounding this volcano was highly active after its formation, featuring five
eruptions in a radius of <7 km around the cone. Notably, most of the cones
are breached, and their breach is oriented SE, towards the Zacapu basin (Figure
4).
Figure 3. Aerial photograph of
Las Cabras volcano and surrounding area. Note the position of Las Cabras and
Cerro el Molcajete on the lower flanks of El Tule shield, and their breaching
in the downslope direction. Las Cabras lavas (margins outlined by white line)
have distinct elongated ridges that form hummocks, one of which is quarried
displaying an oxide-reddish color in its interior. Photo taken from an airplane
by C. Siebe in 2011, looking to the NW.
Figure 4. Map of Las Cabras
volcano and surrounding area drawing the contours of the recent volcanoes on a
5-m-resolution shaded digital elevation model (DEM). Las Cabras scoria cone and
lavas are delineated with a thick yellow line, and thin white lines highlight
surface structures. Sampling locations are shown in yellow and blue circles.
Small case letters refer to areas and features discussed in the text. Arrows
indicate flow directions that were determined from the orientation of
compressional ridges. Two main stages of emplacement were inferred (yellow,
then blue). Note few imperfections of the DEM (irregular, rounded features)
caused by the lack of correction for vegetation, which does not allow to map
the debris avalanche material in detail. Question mark indicates uncertain
identification of hummocks.
Las Cabras cone is relatively large compared to other cones in this
area. It is 170 m high, has a basal diameter of 1.09 km, and a volume of 0.07
km3. Its construction
on the slopes of El Tule shield creates a 45 m height difference between the
upper and lower base of the cone that are 700 m distant. The cone’s external
slopes vary between 28° and 48°, and present a regular erosive pattern made by
30–50 m spaced gullies. The breaching forms a 530 m wide U-shaped opening in
the cone that is oriented to the N120° (Figures 3 and 4). The missing cone
volume is about 0.02 km3, hence 1/4 of the actual cone.
We use the terminology of Guilbaud et al. (2005) to describe the lava
products. The lava flow field reaches a length of 7 km and covers an area of
18.2 km2 with a bulk volume of 0.6 km3. These are minimum values because its margins are buried under
younger lavas. The lava flow field shows a relatively simple structure that
suggests two main stages of emplacement and flow direction: Lava first flowed
to the S and E, forming a main lobe and then, to the N and NE, forming an array
of narrower secondary lobes fed by a channel (Figure 4). The main lobe (a on
Figure 4) is thick, broad, with abundant compressional ridges that are
perpendicular to flow direction, and has lobate and steep margins that raise 40
to 90 m above the surrounding ground, indicating significant yield strength and
viscosity. The secondary lobes directly spread from an open channel that
connects upflow to the cone breach and has compressional ridges in the center
and discontinuous shear zones along the margins (b and c on Figure 4). These
lobes are buried to the N and NE under younger lavas from Malpaís La Víbora, El
Capaxitro, and Las Vigas (Figure 4). The southernmost of them flowed to the
south, following closely the frontal margin of the main lobe until it stopped,
meeting the prominent margins of El Tecolote’s lavas (d on Figure 4). This lobe
has lower-standing margins (40 m) than those of the main lobe and a relatively
smooth surface, and was hence less viscous. It also features lobate relief
marked by topography drops (Figure 4) that were described elsewhere as “down
stepping” and “terrace-like” and attributed to lobe-by-lobe, tube-fed emplacement
(Valentine et al., 2007).
Interestingly, the surface is strongly irregular across most of the lava
flow. It features several-meter-high mounds and ridges that are easy to
identify on the satellite image since they are forested, whereas the flatter surrounding
grounds are mostly occupied by cultivated fields. These features are hummocks
and further described below.
Hummocks
The lava features
high hummocks with steep (>40º) margins and lower, less-steep ones, that are
mostly located along the open-channel and elongated in the flow’s direction
(red and orange polygons on Figure 4). Their size generally decreases downflow.
Their total volume is nearly 15 million m3 (0.015
km3), 80 % of which is made by the high
hummocks (Table 1). The largest and highest hummock (0.004 km3) has a half-moon shape, is 670 m long, <170 m
wide, 60 m high, and stands just downflow of the cone’s breach (e on Figure 4),
seemingly pushed on the side by the flow and blocked by earlier lavas forming a
lateral margin (f on Figure 4). Field observations at this site and at some
mounds in the proximal part of the lava (283 and 284 on Figure 4) report an
abundance of red agglutinates mixed with grey lava blocks. Quarries near the
main road expose the interior of two large steep-sided hummocks, slightly more
downflow (281 and 282 on Figure 4). The hummock at site 281 is 430 m long,
<190 m wide, and 30 m high, while the one at site 282 is 300 m long, <100
m wide, and 10 m high. Their interiors are distinctly red, and consist of crudely-layered,
coarse deposits that contain partly-welded material including abundant bombs (Figure 5a). Bombs range from dense to highly
vesicular, and commonly have elongated, fluidal shapes and vesicular banding
(Figure 5b), as well as deep fractures and surface cracking, indicating intense
shearing, degassing, and cooling during flight (Figure 5c). Some display a thin
white coating that is concentrated along fracture surfaces (Figure 5c). A
breadcrust bomb contained a light-grey finely-vesicular core with irregular
flow-banding and a ~2-cm-thick, black, dense rind (Figure 5d). Other bombs have
cores consisting of partly resorbed light-grey, dacitic xenoliths. One bomb was
whitish and highly vesicular, with a sugary texture.
Figure 5. Hummocks and bombs. Photographs of main features. a) Photograph of quarry into main hummock at site 281 (see Figure 4). Note the oxidized red color of the vertical quarry wall that reflects the abundance of agglutinates, and the numerous large bombs left at the base of the quarry wall, because of their lack of commercial value. Circle indicates a person for scale. b) Large bomb with fusiform shape that evidences inflight deformation of fluid magma. c) Large bomb with intense fracturing and white hydrothermal coating. d) Interior of bomb with xenolithic, light-grey, finely-vesicular core and dark glassy rim. Petrographic analysis shows that the core and the rim have a similar mineralogy and only differ by vesicle content. Hence the dark rim is a quenched margin. e) Bomb from fallout that contains dacitic xenoliths showing clear rounded edges. f) Bomb from fallout that contains dacitic xenoliths showing convoluted, diffuse contact with the andesitic juvenile matrix.
Tephra fallout
Las Cabras volcano produced thick, stratified pyroclastic deposits that
are well exposed in multiple quarries at the base of the El Tule shield (blue
dots in Figure 4). Four complete sections were analyzed in detail (Figure 6). They are located at 50, 500, 1600, and
3500 m from the vent, and range in thickness from 200 cm (distal site 295) to
900 cm (proximal site 279). The two most proximal sections were sampled
thoroughly for granulometric and bulk compositional analysis, while fewer
samples were taken from the two thinner, more distal ones (Figure 6). The ages
of paleosol samples (published previously by Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018) collected from these
stratigraphic sections are reported in Figure 6.
Figure 6. a) Stratigraphic
sections of Las Cabras tephra fallout studied in detail. Capital letters
indicate the position of the samples. Radiocarbon ages of paleosols previously
published by Reyes-Guzmán et al. (2018) are reported in their stratigraphic position. b) Representative
pictures of the lower and upper units at section 194 are shown in the upper
right, for comparison.
Granulometry and
bedding thickness
The tephra sequence
can be subdivided into distinct layers based on their grain size, with marker
beds that can be easily correlated between sections (Figure 6). We distinguish
a basal, finer-grained lower unit (marker beds A to I) and a top,
coarser-grained upper unit (marker beds J to O) (Figure 6), that are described
separately in the following. Note that the transition between both units occurs
sharply. Bombs are common at close (<500 m) distances from the vent, and
their size and abundance both increase vertically in these sections, but
decrease overall with distance from the vent.
The lower unit
consists of a stack of numerous thin, indurated, grey layers of fine to
extremely-fine ash, alternating with slightly coarser and thicker brownish to
light-grayish layers of medium-coarse to very-coarse ash (Figure 6). These two
types of layers are strikingly similar in grain-size across the basal unit at
each section. The fine-grained layers (C, E, G) are generally <1 cm-thick,
poorly sorted (sorting coefficient σ: 2.5–3.1), and contain large amounts
(>30 wt%) of extremely fine ash (ϕ>4). The coarser-grained layers (A, B,
D, F, H, I) are generally >5 cm in thickness and better sorted (σ: 1.2–2.4).
These layers decrease in median grain-size with distance from the vent.
The upper unit is
distinctly coarser and composed of well-sorted, thick layers of fine-to-medium
lapilli separated by thin fine-ash layers with faint boundaries and no internal
bedding (Figure 6). At proximal sections 279 and 194, coarse layers have median
grain sizes between 2 and 3ϕ. They reach 1 m in thickness at section 279, and
50 cm at section 194. At distal section 296, they are ~10 cm thick and have
median grain-sizes of about 1ϕ.
The transition
between the lower and the upper units is marked by a couple of coarse layers
(marker bed J) that present intermediate granulometric characteristics with a
rather coarse mode but a long tail toward smaller grain-sizes, resulting in
poor sorting (Figure 6).
Clast types,
xenoliths, and bombs
The deposits are dominated by juvenile clasts (>90 vol%). These
consist of scoria ranging from black to dark-brown, angular, and poorly
vesicular to light-brown, sub-rounded to elongated, and highly vesicular. Dense
clasts are microcrystalline and opaque, while vesicular ones are glassy and
translucent. Vesicles are more abundant, larger (<5 mm) and coalesced in
vesicular clasts compared to denser ones, where vesicles are few and small
(<0.5 mm). The relative abundance of vesicular vs dense scoria varies greatly
between layers, with no systematic stratigraphic variation.
Accidental lithics are of two main types: 1) White to light-grey,
finely-vesicular clasts, some with vesicular banding, and 2) oxidized, reddish,
dense clasts with few and small vesicles (<1 mm). The light-grey clasts are
abundant, both in coarse and fine-grained layers of the top unit. Some red
clasts were also observed in the basal unit and rare whitish scoriaceous clasts
also occur.
Similar to bombs in hummocks, those found in the tephra sections commonly
present vesicular banding. Some bombs have elongated shapes while others are
intensely fractured and have angular shapes. Few are thoroughly dense, and
present rounded shapes. Some dense bombs from the upper unit present fractured,
dense rinds, and vesicular cores made of banded light-grey material. Such
light-grey material is common in the bombs, where it displays highly variable
shapes ranging from thin wedge-shaped lenses (schlieren) to angular, rounded, or
convoluted blocks (Figures 5e and 5f). The contact of these xenoliths with the
surrounding dark grey juvenile material is either sharp (Figure 5e) or diffuse
(Figure 5f). In some bombs, the light-grey material is disseminated in the
matrix.
Deformation and
erosion features
All sections present
clear evidence for syn-eruptive erosion and deformation. In proximal sections
279 and 194, tephra layers are affected by significant plastic and fragile
deformation. At both sites, the stratification displayed a marked inclination,
reflecting the slope of the pre-eruptive substrate formed by the El Tule lava
shield.
The most abundant
structures in the lower unit of both sections are erosional channels. These
channels mostly affect thick packages of fine-grained layers (C, E, and G
marker beds). At site 194, they are surprisingly uniform, measuring 10 to 18 cm
deep and 30 to 40 cm wide with a regular horizontal spacing at 80 to 100 cm
intervals. They also tend to be vertically aligned (Figure
7a). They cut sharply into the ash layers, and tend to be asymmetric
with one side that is nearly vertical and step-shaped, and the other side
having a low and gradual dip (Figures 7a and 7b). The channels are filled with
wedge-shaped stratified, coarser beds that were deposited subsequently, draping
over the depression and progressively flattening the topography (Figures 7a and
7b). Interestingly, similar features were observed at mm-scale, on a
thin-section made across a package of indurated ash layers intersected
laterally by a channel at section 279 (Figure 7c).
Figure 7. Deformation and erosion structures in Las Cabras tephra
fallout deposits. a) Asymmetric erosional channels affecting several levels of
the lower fallout unit at site 194. Thin black lines highlight the erosional
scars. Note the vertical alignment of three main channels at that specific
location. b) Close-up picture of the central part of an erosional channel
filled by coarse layers. c) Scan of a thin-section made from an indurated
package of ash layers from the lower unit (sample 194G). Main erosional
channels are highlighted by a white line. Note that they seem to correlate with
oxidized levels. Also note vesicles in ash layers. d) Photograph of the upper
unit of proximal section 279 that consists of coarse layers rich in juvenile
bombs, most of which fragmented upon impact, interbedded with thin ash layers
(see arrows) that display pronounced undulations due to bomb impacts and
subsequent mantling. Person for scale is 1.6 m high. e) Photograph of impact
structures caused by the landing of a large juvenile bomb on the lower unit at
site 194. Note the sagging of the fine-grained layers and the formation of a
distinct normal fault that causes a 7 cm vertical displacement. f) Photograph
of the plastic deformation that affected coarse lapilli layers (marker bed J)
behind the large bomb-impact featured in e.
The predominant
type of deformation in the upper unit of both sections was caused by large
bombs that created impact sags (soft deformation) and were mantled by
subsequent deposits. Their abundance at proximal site 279 creates pronounced
undulations in the layers (Figure 7d). Large bombs fragmented upon impact,
forming strings of angular blocks with jigsaw-fit structure (Figure 7d). At
section 194, the impact of a large bomb compacted and crushed the coarse
lapilli layers directly below, and created semi-vertical normal faults in the
fine-grained layers of the lower unit further underneath (Figure 7e). Such
impacts also caused the folding over of the lapilli layers located behind,
evidencing plastic deformation (Figure 7f).
The more distal
sections (295, 296) also display deformation structures. At site 295, the
finely-stratified layers of the lower unit are dissected by ~1 m deep channels
with vertical sidewalls. These are filled with cross-stratified organic soil,
blocks of stratified ash from the basal unit, and lapilli layers from the top
unit, which are either mixed or intercalated. At section 196, the most distal
from the vent, fine-ash layers of the lower unit display fine-scale
cross-stratification and cm-deep channels. The layers of the upper part of this
unit are locally dissected by up to 80 cm-deep and tens of cm-wide channels
with sharp, vertical sidewalls, that are filled with stratified, altered
lapilli from the upper stratigraphic unit.
Petrography
A wide range of samples was studied petrographically using
thin-sections. These included juvenile scoria from different levels of the
proximal tephra fallout sections (some manually separated into vesicular and
dense prior to thin-section preparation), different types of bombs (many
enclosing xenoliths and/or presenting mingling textures), and accidental
lithics that were collected from hummocks and the upper fallout unit, and lava
blocks at different distances from the vent. In this context, the so-called
mingling texture refers to the presence of light-grey bands in the rock.
Results from the modal analyses of selected thin-sections are reported in Table 2 and described below, along with
microtextural characteristics.
Table 2. Modal analyses of
selected thin sections.
Sample name |
Sample type |
Phenocrysts |
Groundmass crystals |
Matrix |
Vesicles |
|||||||||
|
Pl |
Ol |
Bt |
Px |
Op |
Pl |
Ol |
Px |
Op |
|
|
|||
279A |
Scoria |
1.7 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
2.6 |
|
|
66.3 |
26.8 |
||
279E |
Scoria |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
14.8 |
2.1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
82.1 |
12.1 |
||
279F |
Scoria |
1.4 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
1.4 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
62.4 |
23.8 |
||
279J |
Scoria |
0.6 |
1.6 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
73.5 |
26.9 |
||
279Q |
Scoria |
0.7 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
2.5 |
|
0.1 |
34.6 |
31.1 |
||
194ª |
Scoria |
2.2 |
0.6 |
|
|
1 |
38.8 |
3.5 |
|
|
54.5 |
31.5 |
||
194H1 |
Scoria |
1.1 |
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
3.1 |
0.5 |
|
64.3 |
19.7 |
||
194J |
Scoria |
0.9 |
4 |
|
|
|
32 |
7.9 |
|
|
55.2 |
24.4 |
||
194N |
Scoria |
1.5 |
3.2 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
4.3 |
1.4 |
|
48.9 |
28.6 |
||
194I2 |
Vesicular bomb with light grey xenoliths |
1.9 |
0.8 |
|
|
|
17 |
2.6 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
77.3 |
29.4 |
||
194K |
Bomb with vesicular banding |
1.1 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
2.7 |
|
|
86.1 |
15.1 |
||
194P |
Bomb with light-grey xenoliths |
1.1 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
1.6 |
|
|
79.7 |
33.6 |
||
194S1 |
Light-grey bomb (glassy rim) |
2.1 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
|
|
52.2 |
0.3 |
3.9 |
9.1 |
31.3 |
7.2 |
||
194S2 |
Light-grey bomb (interior) |
1.8 |
0.8 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
1.3 |
0.8 |
73.4 |
22.2 |
||
194N |
Poorly vesicular bomb |
1.7 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
0.2 |
4.1 |
|
72 |
9.8 |
||
194P |
Highly vesicular bomb |
0.9 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
1.4 |
0 |
0.1 |
82.5 |
12.8 |
||
194R1B |
Bomb with mingling texture and abundant xenoliths |
1.3 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
|
77.9 |
28.4 |
||
194L3 |
Brown lithic clast |
0.5 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
|
|
12.5 |
0.6 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
82.6 |
33.6 |
||
194M |
Red lithic clast |
0.1 |
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
0.8 |
0 |
|
97.6 |
29 |
||
282 |
Lava |
0.4 |
1.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
1.9 |
0 |
|
77.6 |
20.2 |
||
283 |
Lava |
1.1 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
1.3 |
0.8 |
|
91.5 |
2.3 |
||
284B |
Lava |
0.5 |
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
3 |
|
|
90.6 |
2.3 |
||
285 |
Lava |
0.8 |
1.9 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
1.1 |
0.4 |
|
74.6 |
29 |
||
293 |
Lava |
1.7 |
3.4 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
6.7 |
4.3 |
1.9 |
14.2 |
13.7 |
Crystal and matrix proportions
are in vol. %, normalized on a vesicle-free basis (total vol. minus vesicle
vol.).
All samples display a poorly porphyritic texture, with low phenocryst
contents (<5 vol%) and variable amounts of groundmass crystals (6–81 vol%)
in a glassy to microcrystalline matrix (Table 2). Vesicle content varies and is
lowest in two lava samples, ranging from 12 to 32 vol% in scoria, and 7 to 34
vol% in bombs (Table 2). Vesicular and dense scoria clasts have similar
mineralogy, yet the first type presents a higher content of small plagioclase
laths. Phenocrysts (1–2 mm) are mainly plagioclase (Pl) and olivine (Ol), which
are also present as groundmass crystals (<1 mm), along with oxides (Ox) and,
sometimes, pyroxene (Px) which includes both augite and hypersthene according
to Reyes-Guzman et al. (2018). While Pl and Ol occur in comparable proportions as phenocrysts,
Pl largely dominates in the groundmass. Biotite (Bt) is rare and low in
abundance (<1 vol%) and was exclusively found in light-grey lava blocks,
bombs, and xenoliths where it forms dispersed small phenocrysts with euhedral
lath-shapes to anhedral rounded blobs. A white scoriaceaous clast contained
quartz, K-Feldspar, and Pl.
Upper scoria units have higher abundance in Ol than basal ones. Scoria
clasts from the lower unit of section 279 present oxidized margins with an
opaque groundmass and abundant Ox microphenocrysts (0.1–0.4 vol%, Table 2).
These features were not observed in other sections and probably result from
post-depositional weathering.
Modal percentages are similar for all lava samples, except for sample
293 from the thinner, secondary lobe at furthest distance from the vent (d in
Figure 4) that has distinctly higher Ol-contents, both as phenocrysts and
groundmass crystals.
Phenocrysts (>1 mm) and microphenocrysts (0.1–1 mm) display
disequilibrium textures in all samples. Ol phenocrysts occur as rectangular,
rounded, or skeletal (arrow-shaped) crystals with Cr-spinel inclusions and
embayments, and sometimes surrounded by a reaction corona made of Pl laths. Pl
phenocrysts also commonly display signs of corrosion, such as rounded rims and
sieved cores, internal zoning, and inclusions in some cases. These features are
common in the area (see text and figs. 8e and 8f of Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018). Some Bt and Px also
present corroded cores and zoning. Ol crystals are often grouped in ~1 mm-sized
clusters, sometimes associated with Pl and Px. Bt is sometimes intergrown with
Pl.
Xenoliths in bombs present a wide variety of sizes (mm to cm), textures,
mineral assemblages, and shapes. They may be vesicular or dense, rounded in
shape or angular. They are typically crystal-rich and often present abundant Pl
that may be associated with Ol, less often Ox, and Bt in light-grey clasts.
They often have high amounts of opaque minerals and tend to be associated with
large coalesced vesicles. The darker rims of some large, light-grey bombs only
differ from their interior by their low vesicularity (they display the same
minerals), indicating that they originated by quenching, and hence that the
xenolithic bombs were erupted hot, and vesiculated late, during flight.
Geochemistry
Bulk compositional analyses for Las Cabras samples are reported in Table 3 and some representative elements are
plotted in Figure 8. All products are
calc-alkaline. Juvenile products vary from basaltic andesite to andesite (54–62
wt% SiO2). Samples from the upper tephra unit (late tephra) spread this whole
range, while lavas and samples from the lower tephra unit (early tephra) spread
over a more restricted range (57–61 wt%) (Figure 8). Samples with light-grey
Bt-bearing material are dacitic (63–67 wt% SiO2) and their SiO2 content increases linearly
with the proportion of xenolithic material in them, following straight mixing
lines in bimodal graphs (Figure 8).
Table 3. Bulk rock
compositions. Major elements (oxides) in wt. %, trace elements in ppm.
Sample name |
Tephra fallout (1/3) |
|||||||||||||||
194A |
194B |
194D |
194F |
194H1 |
194H2 |
194I1 |
194I2 |
194J |
194K |
194N |
194O |
194P |
194Q |
295A |
295D |
|
Lat N19° |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
50'00.2" |
49'23.6” |
49'23.6” |
Long W101° |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
53'10.5” |
54'29.2" |
54'29.2" |
Sample type |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bomb with xenolith |
bulk scoria |
bomb |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bomb with xenolith |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
SiO2 |
58.83 |
58.06 |
60.17 |
59.13 |
59.97 |
60.05 |
59.45 |
59.68 |
58.56 |
60.65 |
56.16 |
57.33 |
58.97 |
56.15 |
58.75 |
58.00 |
TiO2 |
0.97 |
0.96 |
0.77 |
0.91 |
0.83 |
0.80 |
0.83 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.75 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.86 |
0.98 |
0.96 |
0.89 |
Al2O3 |
17.78 |
18.08 |
16.58 |
17.11 |
16.36 |
16.23 |
16.33 |
16.23 |
15.58 |
15.51 |
16.57 |
15.98 |
15.92 |
16.68 |
17.50 |
16.60 |
Fe2O3(T) |
6.68 |
6.87 |
5.92 |
6.26 |
5.89 |
5.92 |
6.17 |
6.09 |
6.51 |
5.94 |
7.09 |
6.92 |
6.25 |
7.22 |
7.66 |
7.34 |
MnO |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
MgO |
3.56 |
3.81 |
4.65 |
4.51 |
5.08 |
5.15 |
5.24 |
5.22 |
6.05 |
5.17 |
6.59 |
6.18 |
5.69 |
6.51 |
3.73 |
4.69 |
CaO |
6.26 |
6.48 |
6.15 |
6.19 |
6.04 |
6.03 |
6.06 |
6.03 |
7.09 |
6.21 |
7.38 |
7.36 |
6.56 |
7.31 |
6.43 |
6.37 |
Na2O |
4.03 |
4.00 |
3.75 |
3.88 |
3.73 |
3.73 |
3.80 |
3.82 |
3.52 |
3.61 |
3.54 |
3.51 |
3.71 |
3.42 |
3.85 |
3.70 |
K2O |
1.46 |
1.32 |
1.67 |
1.61 |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.75 |
1.52 |
1.83 |
1.33 |
1.39 |
1.67 |
1.31 |
1.35 |
1.54 |
P2O5 |
0.30 |
0.29 |
0.21 |
0.27 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.25 |
0.24 |
0.22 |
0.20 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.25 |
0.28 |
0.29 |
0.23 |
LOI |
0.26 |
0.33 |
0.42 |
0.23 |
0.34 |
0.44 |
0.34 |
0 |
0.04 |
-0.29 |
-0.09 |
-0.06 |
-0.17 |
0.35 |
0.33 |
0.23 |
Total |
100.9 |
98.71 |
99.65 |
98.2 |
99.37 |
99.04 |
100.7 |
100.5 |
99.09 |
100.1 |
100.4 |
98.67 |
99.9 |
100.3 |
101 |
99.71 |
Sc |
16.4 |
17 |
17.1 |
17.1 |
17.6 |
17.4 |
17.6 |
17.6 |
21.7 |
18 |
21.8 |
21.5 |
19.6 |
21.7 |
15.5 |
16.1 |
V |
142 |
144 |
136 |
131 |
128 |
128 |
129 |
130 |
145 |
129 |
155 |
151 |
137 |
149 |
143 |
143 |
Cr |
46.2 |
50.6 |
161 |
126 |
216 |
211 |
215 |
236 |
293 |
256 |
293 |
277 |
237 |
283 |
51.7 |
124 |
Co |
20.9 |
20.3 |
23.1 |
20.7 |
23.7 |
22.2 |
21.6 |
24.8 |
28.7 |
23.8 |
29.3 |
28.5 |
26.8 |
31.1 |
22.2 |
23.1 |
Ni |
39 |
41 |
80 |
74 |
101 |
103 |
107 |
102 |
112 |
102 |
126 |
121 |
111 |
128 |
44 |
75 |
Cu |
82 |
30 |
32 |
29 |
31 |
31 |
27 |
19 |
31 |
28 |
34 |
33 |
26 |
33 |
34 |
34 |
Zn |
78 |
75 |
62 |
67 |
61 |
63 |
61 |
59 |
55 |
54 |
62 |
62 |
59 |
62 |
76 |
68 |
Rb |
24 |
20 |
32 |
28 |
34 |
33 |
33 |
34 |
28 |
38 |
23 |
24 |
32 |
23 |
20 |
26 |
Sr |
513 |
500 |
378 |
422 |
396 |
377 |
385 |
389 |
397 |
371 |
424 |
422 |
395 |
421 |
497 |
414 |
Y |
18 |
18 |
16 |
18 |
17 |
18 |
18 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
19 |
18 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Zr |
125 |
108 |
98 |
117 |
115 |
116 |
121 |
121 |
127 |
122 |
140 |
134 |
138 |
146 |
115 |
105 |
Nb |
7.8 |
7.4 |
7.2 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.5 |
9 |
9 |
8.4 |
7.9 |
8.7 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.7 |
5.7 |
6.3 |
Cs |
0.7 |
0.6 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
Ba |
458 |
417 |
439 |
447 |
456 |
454 |
452 |
459 |
415 |
471 |
403 |
397 |
455 |
405 |
418 |
422 |
La |
15.3 |
14.4 |
13.7 |
15.3 |
15.7 |
15.4 |
15.7 |
15.8 |
14.8 |
15.3 |
15 |
15.3 |
15.9 |
15.8 |
15.3 |
15.3 |
Ce |
31.4 |
29.8 |
27.7 |
31.1 |
31.6 |
31.6 |
31.7 |
31.9 |
30 |
30.7 |
31 |
31.2 |
31.9 |
32.4 |
31.9 |
30.8 |
Pr |
4.28 |
4.12 |
3.69 |
4.11 |
4.24 |
4.1 |
4.19 |
4.22 |
4.01 |
3.97 |
4.17 |
4.16 |
4.16 |
4.34 |
4.13 |
3.99 |
Nd |
18 |
17.1 |
14.6 |
16.3 |
17 |
16.3 |
17 |
16.8 |
16.3 |
15.9 |
16.9 |
17.4 |
16.4 |
17.5 |
17.5 |
16.7 |
Sm |
3.9 |
3.86 |
3.36 |
3.69 |
3.7 |
3.53 |
3.71 |
3.68 |
3.54 |
3.3 |
3.64 |
3.82 |
3.59 |
3.84 |
3.98 |
3.42 |
Eu |
1.31 |
1.26 |
1.02 |
1.12 |
1.15 |
1.12 |
1.14 |
1.1 |
1.08 |
0.987 |
1.2 |
1.18 |
1.13 |
1.22 |
1.16 |
1.04 |
Gd |
3.7 |
3.69 |
3.08 |
3.44 |
3.27 |
3.41 |
3.43 |
3.4 |
3.35 |
3.15 |
3.42 |
3.47 |
3.34 |
3.54 |
3.39 |
3.05 |
Tb |
0.58 |
0.57 |
0.5 |
0.53 |
0.53 |
0.54 |
0.55 |
0.56 |
0.56 |
0.53 |
0.55 |
0.58 |
0.55 |
0.58 |
0.54 |
0.51 |
Dy |
3.35 |
3.42 |
2.99 |
3.15 |
3.26 |
3.24 |
3.24 |
3.17 |
3.25 |
3.15 |
3.42 |
3.41 |
3.19 |
3.42 |
3.15 |
3.03 |
Ho |
0.67 |
0.68 |
0.61 |
0.64 |
0.67 |
0.64 |
0.65 |
0.63 |
0.63 |
0.6 |
0.71 |
0.69 |
0.66 |
0.68 |
0.63 |
0.61 |
Er |
1.9 |
1.88 |
1.78 |
1.83 |
1.85 |
1.82 |
1.86 |
1.84 |
1.79 |
1.73 |
1.94 |
1.94 |
1.98 |
1.92 |
1.81 |
1.75 |
Tm |
0.289 |
0.294 |
0.282 |
0.276 |
0.284 |
0.277 |
0.297 |
0.298 |
0.277 |
0.271 |
0.298 |
0.28 |
0.286 |
0.293 |
0.264 |
0.27 |
Yb |
1.92 |
1.88 |
1.87 |
1.82 |
1.94 |
1.78 |
1.87 |
1.84 |
1.87 |
1.78 |
1.92 |
1.9 |
1.89 |
2 |
1.7 |
1.67 |
Lu |
0.287 |
0.28 |
0.263 |
0.27 |
0.297 |
0.255 |
0.264 |
0.255 |
0.272 |
0.264 |
0.264 |
0.286 |
0.263 |
0.292 |
0.258 |
0.274 |
Hf |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
3 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
3 |
3 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
Ta |
0.59 |
0.52 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
0.75 |
0.69 |
0.71 |
0.69 |
0.62 |
0.69 |
0.67 |
0.67 |
0.73 |
0.72 |
0.49 |
0.58 |
continues
Table 3. Bulk rock
compositions (cont). Major elements (oxides) in wt. %, trace elements in ppm.
Sample name |
Tephra fallout (2/3) |
|||||||||||||||
295J |
296J |
1A |
279A |
279BD |
279BV |
279C |
279D |
279E |
279FD |
279FV |
279H1 |
279I1 |
279I2 |
279J |
279K |
|
Lat N19° |
49'23.6” |
49'43.1” |
49'58.9" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
Long W101° |
54'29.2" |
55'39.6" |
53'26.8" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
Sample type |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bomb |
bulk scoria |
dense scoria |
vesicular scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
dense scoria |
vesicular scoria |
bulk scoria |
bulk scoria |
bomb |
vesicular scoria |
bomb |
SiO2 |
58.60 |
56.28 |
60.84 |
57.52 |
57.16 |
57.63 |
58.69 |
59.04 |
57.52 |
59.60 |
59.61 |
59.35 |
59.52 |
59.33 |
58.73 |
60.38 |
TiO2 |
0.85 |
0.76 |
0.63 |
0.93 |
0.91 |
0.88 |
0.85 |
0.86 |
0.85 |
0.86 |
0.86 |
0.83 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
0.80 |
0.74 |
Al2O3 |
16.40 |
15.76 |
14.87 |
17.43 |
16.39 |
16.55 |
16.70 |
16.36 |
16.15 |
16.42 |
16.27 |
15.89 |
16.15 |
16.23 |
15.73 |
16.10 |
Fe2O3(T) |
6.95 |
7.39 |
6.68 |
7.84 |
8.12 |
7.42 |
7.52 |
7.20 |
7.45 |
6.98 |
7.54 |
6.96 |
7.17 |
7.00 |
7.14 |
6.58 |
MnO |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
0.13 |
0.21 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
MgO |
4.24 |
4.84 |
4.85 |
3.63 |
4.32 |
4.47 |
4.33 |
4.36 |
4.40 |
4.22 |
4.24 |
5.09 |
4.47 |
5.30 |
6.00 |
5.12 |
CaO |
6.16 |
6.41 |
5.77 |
6.40 |
6.84 |
6.38 |
6.29 |
6.31 |
6.26 |
5.94 |
5.88 |
6.14 |
6.15 |
6.37 |
6.90 |
6.24 |
Na2O |
3.48 |
3.21 |
3.43 |
3.87 |
3.81 |
3.72 |
3.75 |
3.67 |
3.68 |
3.85 |
3.76 |
3.73 |
3.83 |
3.71 |
3.48 |
3.63 |
K2O |
1.61 |
1.50 |
2.02 |
1.31 |
1.61 |
1.54 |
1.57 |
1.56 |
1.64 |
1.69 |
1.71 |
1.67 |
1.67 |
1.62 |
1.55 |
1.78 |
P2O5 |
0.21 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.29 |
0.26 |
0.26 |
0.23 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
0.24 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.25 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
LOI |
0.6 |
2.91 |
-0.13 |
0.67 |
1.2 |
0.55 |
0.88 |
0.71 |
0.77 |
0.68 |
0.72 |
0.2 |
0.46 |
-0.05 |
0.11 |
-0.3 |
Total |
99.22 |
99.37 |
99.31 |
100 |
100.8 |
99.52 |
101 |
100.4 |
99.09 |
100.6 |
100.9 |
100.2 |
100.7 |
100.8 |
100.8 |
100.6 |
Sc |
16.4 |
20 |
17.1 |
16.7 |
17.3 |
17.8 |
17.3 |
17.3 |
17.2 |
16.4 |
16 |
17.6 |
16.7 |
17.8 |
19.8 |
18.1 |
V |
139 |
119 |
105 |
145 |
138 |
142 |
143 |
140 |
139 |
128 |
126 |
128 |
132 |
134 |
138 |
125 |
Cr |
136 |
267 |
252 |
56.5 |
128 |
119 |
130 |
130 |
146 |
143 |
140 |
218 |
145 |
220 |
276 |
226 |
Co |
21.2 |
28.3 |
22.6 |
20.1 |
22.6 |
21.7 |
21.5 |
21.2 |
20.9 |
23.5 |
19.3 |
23.3 |
22.4 |
24.9 |
26.1 |
24.2 |
Ni |
68 |
91 |
103 |
37 |
63 |
61 |
60 |
63 |
65 |
67 |
67 |
87 |
69 |
94 |
107 |
92 |
Cu |
31 |
37 |
29 |
30 |
38 |
32 |
29 |
45 |
44 |
25 |
33 |
27 |
30 |
28 |
36 |
31 |
Zn |
66 |
57 |
133 |
82 |
102 |
69 |
71 |
79 |
70 |
66 |
66 |
59 |
70 |
59 |
60 |
55 |
Rb |
29 |
30 |
45 |
21 |
28 |
27 |
28 |
28 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
31 |
30 |
29 |
29 |
36 |
Sr |
414 |
360 |
381 |
493 |
459 |
435 |
435 |
411 |
407 |
430 |
422 |
401 |
447 |
413 |
374 |
368 |
Y |
20 |
17 |
24 |
17 |
24 |
19 |
17 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
17 |
18 |
18 |
17 |
17 |
16 |
Zr |
109 |
128 |
125 |
118 |
111 |
114 |
112 |
110 |
112 |
125 |
122 |
128 |
120 |
131 |
120 |
116 |
Nb |
6.2 |
7.2 |
46.9 |
7.4 |
9.2 |
8 |
8 |
6.9 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
6.8 |
6.6 |
6 |
Cs |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1 |
Ba |
450 |
421 |
1.4 |
430 |
584 |
453 |
472 |
428 |
455 |
463 |
466 |
447 |
469 |
447 |
423 |
467 |
La |
15.9 |
14.5 |
44.2 |
36 |
122 |
46.6 |
41.8 |
21.4 |
36.4 |
24.6 |
25 |
19.2 |
28 |
17 |
18.8 |
16 |
Ce |
31.7 |
28.9 |
90.2 |
61.3 |
251 |
83.2 |
78.8 |
39.5 |
68.8 |
46.6 |
47.2 |
36.9 |
55.6 |
33.5 |
36.7 |
31.9 |
Pr |
4.03 |
3.76 |
9.92 |
7.5 |
34.4 |
10.4 |
10.1 |
4.99 |
8.88 |
5.79 |
6.02 |
4.75 |
7.35 |
4.4 |
4.68 |
4.08 |
Nd |
16.2 |
15.9 |
32.2 |
29.4 |
144 |
39.6 |
39.7 |
20.2 |
36 |
23.3 |
23.4 |
18.8 |
30.5 |
18 |
18.7 |
16.3 |
Sm |
3.33 |
3.6 |
7.15 |
5.9 |
27.8 |
7.69 |
7.43 |
4.19 |
6.89 |
4.5 |
4.57 |
3.9 |
5.97 |
3.81 |
3.78 |
3.45 |
Eu |
1 |
0.952 |
2.27 |
1.72 |
6.4 |
2.15 |
1.97 |
1.28 |
1.84 |
1.33 |
1.34 |
1.16 |
1.59 |
1.09 |
1.07 |
0.95 |
Gd |
3.04 |
3.21 |
7.05 |
5.29 |
14.9 |
6 |
5.38 |
3.94 |
5.13 |
4.15 |
4.05 |
3.85 |
4.8 |
3.7 |
3.55 |
3.19 |
Tb |
0.51 |
0.53 |
1.03 |
0.75 |
1.31 |
0.81 |
0.72 |
0.64 |
0.68 |
0.65 |
0.64 |
0.61 |
0.67 |
0.6 |
0.57 |
0.52 |
Dy |
3 |
3.07 |
5.39 |
4.03 |
5.47 |
4.21 |
3.88 |
3.53 |
3.58 |
3.67 |
3.4 |
3.47 |
3.57 |
3.47 |
3.22 |
3.06 |
Ho |
0.58 |
0.6 |
0.96 |
0.75 |
0.93 |
0.74 |
0.7 |
0.68 |
0.7 |
0.69 |
0.66 |
0.67 |
0.67 |
0.66 |
0.64 |
0.62 |
Er |
1.71 |
1.69 |
2.6 |
2.02 |
2.53 |
2.14 |
1.98 |
1.93 |
1.97 |
1.93 |
1.87 |
1.95 |
1.95 |
1.91 |
1.87 |
1.77 |
Tm |
0.256 |
0.265 |
0.378 |
0.319 |
0.361 |
0.302 |
0.31 |
0.312 |
0.292 |
0.309 |
0.305 |
0.319 |
0.291 |
0.299 |
0.287 |
0.274 |
Yb |
1.65 |
1.75 |
2.41 |
2.01 |
2.35 |
2 |
1.97 |
1.95 |
1.97 |
1.94 |
2.06 |
1.99 |
1.87 |
1.94 |
1.83 |
1.79 |
Lu |
0.26 |
0.26 |
0.37 |
0.293 |
0.329 |
0.3 |
0.292 |
0.281 |
0.274 |
0.279 |
0.282 |
0.292 |
0.279 |
0.284 |
0.281 |
0.27 |
Hf |
2.6 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
3 |
2.9 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
Ta |
0.57 |
0.55 |
0.84 |
0.52 |
0.62 |
1.15 |
4.14 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.63 |
3.33 |
0.64 |
0.62 |
0.72 |
0.6 |
0.63 |
continues
Table 3. Bulk rock
compositions (final). Major elements (oxides) in wt. %, trace elements in ppm.
Sample name |
Tephra fallout (3/3) |
Xenolithic bombs |
Lava flow |
|||||||||||||
279O |
279P |
279Q |
279TD |
279TV |
279N |
194S |
281A |
8 |
21 |
280 |
282 |
283 |
284B |
285 |
293 |
|
Lat N19° |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
49'47.0" |
50'00.2" |
49'23.2" |
50'38.8" |
50'35.7" |
49'36.9" |
49'25.8" |
49'38.8" |
49'25.9" |
49'11.00" |
49'34.3" |
Long W101° |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'51.7" |
53'10.5" |
51'31.3" |
50'54.8" |
50'53.5" |
51'09.5" |
51'58.5" |
53'52.0" |
52'29.7" |
51'0.54" |
49'53.0" |
Sample type |
bulk scoria |
bomb |
bulk scoria |
dense scoria |
vesicular scoria |
bomb with xenolith |
light-grey bomb |
light-grey bomb |
lava (late) |
lava (late) |
lava (late) |
lava (hummock) |
lava (hummock) |
lava (aglutinate) |
lava (early) |
lava (late) |
SiO2 |
56.81 |
54.50 |
56.57 |
59.60 |
59.01 |
63.16 |
65.01 |
66.49 |
58.65 |
59.33 |
59.68 |
54.76 |
60.75 |
58.61 |
59.49 |
59.36 |
TiO2 |
0.90 |
0.97 |
1.01 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.65 |
0.60 |
0.47 |
0.75 |
0.87 |
0.85 |
0.92 |
0.81 |
0.94 |
0.88 |
0.78 |
Al2O3 |
16.32 |
16.31 |
16.54 |
15.56 |
15.80 |
15.34 |
15.10 |
14.35 |
15.17 |
16.34 |
15.72 |
15.99 |
16.01 |
16.45 |
16.33 |
15.66 |
Fe2O3(T) |
7.35 |
8.18 |
7.99 |
7.02 |
7.22 |
5.60 |
4.50 |
3.78 |
6.93 |
6.98 |
7.01 |
7.07 |
6.75 |
7.32 |
6.75 |
6.52 |
MnO |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
MgO |
6.02 |
6.62 |
6.06 |
5.57 |
5.61 |
4.45 |
3.69 |
2.51 |
6.05 |
4.61 |
5.44 |
5.18 |
4.50 |
5.22 |
4.26 |
5.21 |
CaO |
7.14 |
7.48 |
7.18 |
6.59 |
6.66 |
4.79 |
4.62 |
3.70 |
6.85 |
6.32 |
6.36 |
6.65 |
6.04 |
6.74 |
6.02 |
6.14 |
Na2O |
3.53 |
3.53 |
3.30 |
3.53 |
3.56 |
3.76 |
3.67 |
3.53 |
3.37 |
3.81 |
3.61 |
3.71 |
3.72 |
3.71 |
3.91 |
3.44 |
K2O |
1.41 |
1.23 |
1.29 |
1.66 |
1.62 |
2.23 |
2.53 |
2.98 |
1.66 |
1.69 |
1.67 |
1.55 |
1.66 |
1.59 |
1.72 |
1.97 |
P2O5 |
0.25 |
0.29 |
0.27 |
0.21 |
0.23 |
0.16 |
0.17 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.27 |
0.24 |
0.27 |
0.21 |
0.28 |
0.24 |
0.21 |
LOI |
0.23 |
-0.39 |
0.45 |
0.19 |
0.15 |
0.03 |
1.53 |
1.54 |
0.56 |
-0.12 |
0.26 |
4.51 |
-0.3 |
-0.41 |
-0.24 |
0.5 |
Total |
100.1 |
98.85 |
100.8 |
100.8 |
100.8 |
100.3 |
99.48 |
99.53 |
100.3 |
100.2 |
101 |
100.7 |
100.3 |
100.6 |
99.48 |
99.91 |
Sc |
20.3 |
21.7 |
21.3 |
17 |
19.9 |
14.5 |
12.5 |
10 |
19.8 |
17.6 |
18.1 |
19.1 |
16.4 |
19 |
16.4 |
17.9 |
V |
143 |
154 |
145 |
133 |
133 |
103 |
89 |
66 |
131 |
135 |
130 |
136 |
127 |
140 |
129 |
125 |
Cr |
235 |
294 |
231 |
221 |
248 |
178 |
165 |
100 |
277 |
182 |
222 |
178 |
173 |
175 |
126 |
276 |
Co |
26.8 |
32.2 |
28.2 |
20.6 |
26.2 |
20.1 |
18.1 |
13.5 |
22.9 |
23.7 |
24.4 |
24.6 |
23.2 |
25.3 |
21.1 |
24.8 |
Ni |
113 |
132 |
116 |
101 |
100 |
84 |
73 |
49 |
117 |
80 |
101 |
92 |
76 |
88 |
67 |
105 |
Cu |
39 |
41 |
48 |
28 |
53 |
29 |
15 |
14 |
25 |
29 |
30 |
56 |
34 |
32 |
26 |
27 |
Zn |
63 |
65 |
64 |
57 |
58 |
53 |
48 |
44 |
52 |
68 |
63 |
60 |
62 |
62 |
62 |
56 |
Rb |
26 |
21 |
23 |
31 |
30 |
48 |
53 |
61 |
29 |
31 |
30 |
29 |
30 |
30 |
31 |
37 |
Sr |
415 |
429 |
431 |
369 |
375 |
337 |
304 |
272 |
374 |
461 |
395 |
421 |
425 |
422 |
431 |
384 |
Y |
18 |
18 |
20 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
19 |
18 |
17 |
18 |
17 |
17 |
Zr |
131 |
131 |
142 |
122 |
122 |
120 |
119 |
108 |
119 |
130 |
131 |
124 |
117 |
140 |
119 |
114 |
Nb |
7.3 |
7 |
8.9 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.4 |
8.7 |
7 |
7.7 |
9.4 |
7.4 |
6.8 |
6.1 |
9 |
6.1 |
7.3 |
Cs |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
2 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
Ba |
409 |
379 |
416 |
437 |
435 |
550 |
569 |
634 |
427 |
1 |
441 |
443 |
453 |
451 |
481 |
446 |
La |
16.5 |
16.2 |
17.6 |
18.2 |
18.6 |
16.3 |
16.6 |
18.4 |
15.4 |
24 |
17.4 |
18.8 |
16.3 |
17.4 |
16.7 |
16.6 |
Ce |
33.3 |
33.6 |
35.5 |
34.9 |
36.2 |
32.1 |
32.1 |
34.3 |
31.8 |
48 |
34.1 |
37.2 |
32.6 |
35.3 |
33.4 |
33.1 |
Pr |
4.44 |
4.52 |
4.79 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
4.02 |
3.99 |
4.07 |
3.83 |
5.6 |
4.44 |
4.91 |
4.29 |
4.69 |
4.43 |
4.28 |
Nd |
17.7 |
18.6 |
19.4 |
17.4 |
18.5 |
15.9 |
15.4 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
19.5 |
18.2 |
19.8 |
16.9 |
18.7 |
18.1 |
18.1 |
Sm |
3.77 |
3.94 |
4.13 |
3.75 |
3.84 |
3.26 |
3.12 |
3.04 |
3.29 |
4.14 |
3.69 |
4.2 |
3.71 |
3.84 |
3.85 |
3.62 |
Eu |
1.13 |
1.24 |
1.21 |
1.09 |
1.06 |
0.912 |
0.848 |
0.789 |
0.971 |
1.15 |
1.14 |
1.22 |
1.03 |
1.2 |
1.13 |
1.02 |
Gd |
3.75 |
4.02 |
4.01 |
3.49 |
3.53 |
2.74 |
2.87 |
2.56 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.56 |
4.01 |
3.57 |
3.85 |
3.72 |
3.19 |
Tb |
0.62 |
0.65 |
0.66 |
0.56 |
0.58 |
0.47 |
0.47 |
0.42 |
0.51 |
0.57 |
0.59 |
0.65 |
0.57 |
0.63 |
0.6 |
0.52 |
Dy |
3.48 |
3.6 |
3.73 |
3.32 |
3.32 |
2.85 |
2.81 |
2.51 |
3.06 |
3.31 |
3.39 |
3.73 |
3.28 |
3.65 |
3.48 |
3.11 |
Ho |
0.69 |
0.72 |
0.74 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
0.58 |
0.56 |
0.51 |
0.6 |
0.64 |
0.68 |
0.72 |
0.63 |
0.71 |
0.67 |
0.63 |
Er |
2.04 |
2.1 |
2.08 |
1.87 |
1.87 |
1.74 |
1.61 |
1.59 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.98 |
2.08 |
1.84 |
2.06 |
1.92 |
1.79 |
Tm |
0.312 |
0.331 |
0.327 |
0.295 |
0.298 |
0.265 |
0.252 |
0.25 |
0.274 |
0.293 |
0.301 |
0.321 |
0.286 |
0.317 |
0.292 |
0.268 |
Yb |
2.02 |
2.16 |
2.09 |
1.91 |
2 |
1.74 |
1.67 |
1.64 |
1.91 |
1.9 |
1.96 |
2.07 |
1.87 |
2.05 |
1.85 |
1.77 |
Lu |
0.292 |
0.299 |
0.318 |
0.299 |
0.297 |
0.279 |
0.252 |
0.253 |
0.293 |
0.301 |
0.305 |
0.303 |
0.28 |
0.312 |
0.297 |
0.275 |
Hf |
2.9 |
3 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
3 |
Ta |
0.61 |
0.71 |
0.64 |
0.61 |
0.6 |
0.41 |
0.85 |
0.89 |
0.75 |
0.25 |
0.64 |
0.72 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
Figure 8. Major element compositions of Las Cabras samples. Note the
straight linear trends followed by the samples with a higher content of
light-grey xenolithic material (in red prisms). The circle locates samples from
layers A and B that have slightly distinct compositions (see text). The lava
samples (yellow triangles) show a broad affinity with the early tephra.
Juveniles present good, linear negative correlations of FeO, CaO, and
TiO2 with SiO2, and a positive correlation
of K2O with SiO2 (Figure 8). Plots of MgO, Al2O3, Na2O, P2O5, and MnO versus SiO2 show more scatter. Notably,
samples from the lowermost tephra layers (A and B) have distinctly lower MgO,
higher Al2O3, Na2O, P2O5, and MnO, lower Ni and higher Sr compared to other samples with similar
SiO2 (Figure 8). We
note that these samples contain high amounts of Pl phenocrysts with
disequilibrium textures, which could explain their distinct composition.
MgO is perfectly correlated with Ni (R2=0.9) and Cr for all samples.
There is a broad linear decrease in Ni and MgO with stratigraphic height in the
tephra sections (Figure 9), but other
elements show scatter or no significant change. We note that samples from the
lower unit of section 279 are abnormally enriched in La and other light Rare
Earth Elements (light-REE), which is not observed in other sections (Figure 9),
and is correlated with a higher degree of oxidation of the scoria. The quarry
wall where these samples were collected was buried at the base by reworked
soil, loose ash and scoria, and higher-up, it was coated by a thin layer of mud
resulting from water runoff. As all REE and in particular light-REE elements
are mobile in fluids, we infer that this impregnation by fluids significantly
altered the clasts from the lowermost tephra layers, especially those near
contact with the impermeable paleosol, and caused their oxidation and
enrichment in mobile elements. We note however that such alteration did not
affect major element concentrations. Such effect may be relatively common;
however, we are not aware of other studies that report it.
Figure 9. Stratigraphic
variations of Ni, MgO, and La in tephra marker beds. Note the broad linear trend
for Ni and MgO, despite some scatter between different sections, in particular
for layer K (the blue line shows the linear least-square fit of data from
section 279, and the value of the residual squared R2 is reported). For La, note
that only samples from the lower unit of section 279 (Figures 4 and 6) are
enriched in this element. Dense oxidized clasts of layer B (Bd on figure) have
the highest concentrations, whereas vesicular clasts from the same layer (Bv on
figure) are less enriched. This behavior was observed for all light REE.
Except for those samples, all lava and tephra samples spread a rather
small range in trace elements. Dacitic xenoliths have slightly higher
concentrations in less compatible elements (Cs, Rb, Ba, Th, Ta) and lower
concentrations in more compatible ones (medium and heavy-REE; Sr), with
negative anomalies in P and Ti. All samples have arc-type trace element
patterns with negative anomalies in Nb and Ta and relative enrichment in
light-REE in comparison to heavy-REE.
INTERPRETATION AND
DISCUSSION
Las Cabras is a simple, horseshoe-shaped volcano that is morphologically
similar to many others in the MVGF. However, it presents several
particularities that shed light on the processes that can operate during
monogenetic eruptions and their related hazards.
Eruption age, size,
chronology and eruptive style
The age of the eruption can be refined by revisiting the existing
paleosol dates (Reyes-Guzman et al., 2018). Three of these have similar overlapping age ranges (27.5–28.3
cal kyrs BP) while the two others are older by 2000 to 5000 yrs (29.5–32 kyrs
BP). The older ages can be attributed to slope-driven pre-eruptive surface
erosion that exposed older deeper parts of the soils that then were covered by
the tephra. Given that paleosols are older than the overlying tephra deposits
and because of the long time-lapse for soil formation, we prefer the younger
ages and estimate that the eruption took place between 26 and 27 kyrs BP.
In terms of size, Las Cabras scoria cone height (170 m), lava flow
length (>7 km), and total erupted volume (>0.6 km3) are higher than median
values for scoria cones in the MGVF (90 m, 3 km, and 0.2 km3, respectively, according to
Hasenaka and Carmichael, 1985). Hence, the eruption was relatively large in
magnitude and possibly long-lasting (Porter 1972). The decade-long eruptions of
Jorullo and Paricutin emitted comparable volumes of lava (Guilbaud et al., 2009) but constructed higher
cones (220 and 290 m, respectively), implying that the explosive activity was
more intense and probably also lasted longer. Lavas at Las Cabras nevertheless
reached longer distances (>7 km) than at Jorullo and Paricutin (~5 km),
which seems to be related to their constriction in a valley, since they had
similar bulk compositions and hence viscosity. The simpler morphology of Las
Cabras lavas in comparison to the complex lava field erupted at Jorullo and
Paricutin, indicates a more continuous lava output.
Stratigraphic evidence shows that the eruption of Las Cabras was
initially mainly explosive, emitting ash, lapilli, and bombs building a large
cone and depositing tephra fallout, and then dominantly effusive, forming the
lava flow. Both activities were however probably simultaneous at some stage.
There are not any major erosional discontinuities in the tephra sequence and
there is no evidence for a vertical stacking of distinct flow units (that would
indicate pauses in the lava output), thus, both the explosive and effusive
activity must have been continuous. The early explosive activity alternated
between strong explosions generating layers of dense and fine ash, and weaker
explosions producing coarser and more vesicular scoria (early tephra),
indicating variable magma and gas flux in the conduit or the occurrence of
several vents acting at the same time, as observed at Paricutin (Foshag and
González-Reyna, 1956). A significant decrease in explosivity with time is
marked by an increase in tephra coarseness and bomb abundance in the
stratigraphy. This weakening in the activity was probably associated with
simultaneous lava emission from the base of the cone, as also observed at
Paricutin (Foshag and González-Reyna, 1956).
The lavas first spread to the south and southeast, filling a
pre-existing valley with a broad and viscous, thick (40–90 m) lava lobe. The
resulting relief inversion was the probable cause for a shift in the main flow
direction to the N and NE, which formed an array of laterally-emplaced, narrow
lava lobes fed from the vent through an open-channel. The distinct morphology
of these lobes compared to the earlier-emplaced, main lobe suggest a decrease
in lava viscosity, which may be due to a change in magma composition. The last
eruptive event is related to the cone collapse and formation of large hummocks
on the lava, which will now be discussed more extensively.
Hummock formation
Las Cabras lavas are covered by large hummocks made of thick piles of
agglutinates and large bombs which, from their characteristics, must have
formed by the landing of hot and large pyroclasts very close to the vent, and
hence originated from the cone’s interior (Holm, 1987). Some bombs contain
dacitic material that appear only in the upper tephra unit, indicating that the
collapse took place late in the eruption sequence. The largest and steepest
hummocks preserve primary stratification and hence have experienced minor
amounts of disruption during transport, while lower hummocks that are made of
looser, less-welded deposits underwent some disaggregation. The volume of all
mappable hummocks makes 80 vol% of the breached sector, the rest probably
consisting of smaller fragments (Table 1). It is hence likely that they are the
product of the cone disruption late in the eruption, forming the breach that is
still visible. Because the hummocks are not covered by other eruptive products,
this disruption event apparently terminated the eruption.
Such features (hummocks made of piles of agglutinates over lavas) are
common in basaltic lava fields and usually associated with cone breaching (e.g., Porter, 1972; Holm, 1987;
Valentine et al., 2006; Németh et al., 2011; Kereszturi et al., 2012). A significant proportion of scoria cones in monogenetic fields
is breached (global average: 32%, TMVB average: 35%, Tibaldi, 1995) and this
breaching is often attributed to the effect of the intrusion of magma in the
cone. Proximal exposures at Pinacate in NW Mexico show high amounts of magma
injection (sills, dikes) and upwelling (lava lakes, overspills) within large
cones, which in most cases provoked catastrophic wall failure through the
weakening of the cone base and outward pressure imparted on the wall (Gutmann,
1979). The hummocks are generally considered as having been carried away
passively (rafted) on top of the lava that caused the breach in the first place
(Gutmann, 1979; Holm, 1987; Valentine et al., 2006, 2007; Nemeth et al., 2011). Early studies suggest that this process mostly takes place near
the end of the eruption (Scott and Trash, 1971; Gutmann, 1979), yet, later
works show that it can occur at all stages of the eruption, as the cone breach
can be sealed by subsequent explosions (Holm, 1987; Németh et al., 2011; Younger et al., 2019). At Paricutin, the
main cone was breached numerous times during the early eruptive period, each of
these events associated with rapid increases in lava outflow (Foshag and
González-Reyna, 1956). Nevertheless, there are examples where the cone sector
collapse seems to be un-related to lava emissions (Tibaldi, 1995), such as the
one described in detail at a historic, 180 m-high cone in Tenerife (Romero et al., 2021). In this latter case,
the processes involved and the resulting deposits closely resemble those
associated with collapse at stratovolcanoes, with faulting as a trigger, and
ensuing violent explosive activity (Romero et al., 2021).
At Las Cabras, deep cuts into the lavas are largely absent and
post-eruptive weathering and anthropic activities (e.g., agriculture) have modified the
surface hiding lithologic contacts. These circumstances prevented us from
deciphering whether the hummocks are part of a debris avalanche deposit that
was suddenly emplaced over the lavas or if they were transported by the lava
itself in a more passive and slower rafting process. Nevertheless, the
elongated shapes of many hummocks that are aligned in the main flow direction
and their concentration in the late-formed open-channel suggest that they were
emplaced along with the late lava outflow that formed the secondary lobes.
Irrespective of the exact hummock transport mechanism, the intactness and large
size of them indicate clearly that it was a catastrophic event and not the
result of a long-lasting progressive, cone breaching process that would have resulted
in higher fragmentation, such as observed elsewhere (Younger et al., 2019).
An analog for what could have happened at Las Cabras was found in the
historical accounts of the Paricutin eruption (Foshag and González-Reyna,
1956). On June 20, 1943, a large collapse removed ¼ of the cone perimeter, the
lava carrying “two long terraces” that originated as slumping blocks from the
cone and contained pink oxidized material that crumbed down their steep slopes
(note the resemblance with high hummocks at Las Cabras). Noteworthy, this event
was preceded by “tremendous roar” followed by a “tremendous blast” that
suggests the decompression of the magmatic system as a result of the cone
failure. However, this event was followed at Paricutin by another eight years of
activity whereas it was the last event at Las Cabras, possibly as a consequence
of an end in the magma supply.
Pre-existing slope
and cone collapse
Our study shows that the Las Cabras cone breaching was caused by the
catastrophic destruction of its downslope-facing flank. All nearby cones also
located on El Tule are equally breached in the direction of the shield’s slopes
(El Pueblito, El Molcajete, El Molcajetito, Figure 4), hence we believe that
the inclined underlying slope was the main factor that promoted cone breaching.
These other cones, however, do not preserve large hummocks such as those of Las
Cabras, which may be partly related to their smaller size, or to posterior lava
emissions covering them. El Tule shield flanks are relatively steep, ranging from 10 to 20
degrees in average. Such slope is high in comparison to the average of other
shields measured in the MGVF and comparable to domes (Hasenaka, 1994), which
probably reflect the andesitic composition of the shield and its poorly-altered
morphology deriving from its young age (116±8 ka, Reyes Guzmán et al., 2018).
Analogue experiments of fluid intrusions within cones have been made to
define the morphological parameters of scoria cones that inform about the
geometry of their feeder dike (Tibaldi, 1995). Those reveal that in case of a
strong substrate inclination (>9º), the cone undergoes breaching in the
downslope direction, irrespectively of other factors such as the strike or dip
of the dike and cone and lava properties (density, height, etc.), showing that
the effect of gravity dominates in such cases. Interestingly, sensors in the
analogue cone detected a pressure increase in the downslope segment just prior
to its collapse, which was related to the lateral loading effect of the
dike-fed lava in that direction (Tibaldi, 1995). Thus, the relatively steep
slope on which Las Cabras cone formed was a main conditioning factor for the
collapse. As for the triggering, it is probable that the late intrusion of lava
in the downslope cone segment would have weakened it and pushed it away,
leading to sudden destabilization.
Erosional processes
and consequences for hazards
Several of the structures preserved in the tephra deposits are
indicative of the presence of considerable amounts of water in the environment
during the explosive part of the eruption. The shallow channels that dissect
packages of fine-grained layers in the lower part of the tephra sections can be
compared to rills that cut into soils by the erosive action of flowing water.
Tephra deposits are usually highly porous and do not present such behavior
(water sips through quickly without eroding), but our granulometric data
indicate that fine-grained layers at Las Cabras contain a high amount of
very-fine-ash material that would have impeded infiltration and favored rill
formation. In addition, the clear cuts observed at millimetric scale in the
fine ash suggest the rapid formation above some layers of a superficial crust
that acted as a water seal, maybe due to the impact of raindrops (Segerstrom,
1950). The formation of the rills was likely further promoted by the slope of
the substrate, as observed at Paricutin (Segerstrom, 1950). The steepness of
the channel walls evidences the high degree of cohesion of the compacted,
water-soaked layers, and their preservation was possibly allowed by their rapid
burying by subsequently-deposited tephra layers, indicating an uninterrupted
tephra fall. The commonness of bomb impact sags can also be related to the
wetness of the tephra layers (in particular the fine-grained ones) that
deformed both plastically and brittlely upon impact.
In regard to the origin of the water, an underground or superficial
source (such as a river, small pond, or a shallow aquifer) seems unlikely as
the strata lack the peculiarities of phreatomagmatic deposits that typically
display pervasive cross-bedding, high xenolith content, poorly-vesicular
juveniles, cauliflower textures, and accretionary lapilli in fine layers (e.g., Kshirsagar et al., 2015). Instead, its origin
might be sought in torrential rain, hence indicating wet paleoclimatic
conditions. Would this be consistent with independent paleoclimatic data? The
revision of paleosol dates suggests that the eruption occurred at 26–27 kyrs
BP, which corresponds to the beginning of the last glacial maximum (26.5–19
kyrs BP; Clark et al., 2009). Despite some inconsistencies in paleoclimatic evidence from
lakes in Central Mexico (Kshirsagar et al., 2015), it seems that this was a cold and wet period in this area,
coherent with our interpretations. Note however that similar erosive processes
occurred during the Paricutin eruption (Segerstrom, 1950), indicating that it
can occur in modern days in this region.
Such intense rain-driven tephra erosion has consequences for hazards, as
observed during numerous historic eruptions, including Paricutin (Segerstrom,
1950) and Jorullo (Guilbaud et al., 2009). During the Las Cabras eruption, this would have produced in the
early stages lahars or debris flows that would have affected the valley between
the El Tule and Tecolote shields, maybe even reaching the Zacapu lake shore
located 9 km downslope. For example, at Jorullo, eruption-related lahar
deposits were found in the village of La Huacana located 10 km downslope from
the vent (Guilbaud et al., 2009), proving that lahars generated during monogenetic eruptions can
reach long distances. Related deposits would have been mostly covered by the
lavas emitted later and which flowed in the same direction.
Magmatic processes
Juvenile products from the Las Cabras eruption spread a notable range in
bulk composition (8 wt% in SiO2, 4 wt% in MgO) and present textural characteristics that suggest
processes of magma contamination, mixing, and differentiation. Our observations
allow some preliminary insights into those processes and place constraints on
future models that should include isotopic data.
The linear trends observed in bimodal plots could be either explained by
a process of fractional crystallization of the observed mineral phases (Pl, Ol,
Px, Ox), or by a process of assimilation of the dacitic magma which was found
as xenoliths in the late tephra. Nevertheless, the mingling textures, absence
of dacitic minerals such as Bt in the juvenile andesite, as well as the similar
range in bulk composition of early and late tephra, indicate limited mixing and
assimilation of this dacitic melt, which is hence unlikely to have caused the
compositional trends. Nonetheless, all phenocrysts in the juveniles display
textures that indicate that they were at disequilibrium with their host.
Therefore, their presence points to mixing of the main andesitic magma with
other melts of different origins or storage conditions, which should be
constrained by more detailed petrographic work and compositional data (mineral
compositions, isotopic ratios). As other volcanoes in this area present similar
textural characteristics (e.g., Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018), we hypothesize that this process could be common in the area,
and responsible for the dominance of andesites.
There is a broad increase in bulk MgO and Ni with stratigraphic height
in the tephra that could have two causes. The emitted melts could have become
increasingly more primitive during the eruption, due to a continuous
replenishment of the shallow system by more primitive magmas from depth (magma
recharge). Alternatively, a process of physical separation of the crystals in
the shallow magma reservoir or in the conduit could have progressively
increased the concentrations in Ol in the erupted melt and decreased those of
Pl, due to their density contrast. Our modal analysis does not show a
significant and clear trend of Ol-enrichment in the section, which tend to
favor the first hypothesis (magma recharge), while the higher content in Ol in
the upper tephra (Table 2) can be related to their higher proportions in these
more primitive melts.
The occurrence of large dacitic bombs with quenched margins in the late
tephra indicate that at that stage of the eruption, the andesitic melt
intersected a hot, dacitic magma batch that was probably residing at shallow
depth below the vent. The appearance of the dacitic xenoliths coincides with a
marked decrease in eruption explosivity (increase in bomb sizes and abundance)
that finally led to lava emission. A widening (or flaring) in the vent could
both explain a decrease in flux and hence explosive intensity, as well as the
intersection of an adjacent dacitic magma body. The origin of this dacitic melt
is uncertain. However, we note that it could possibly be derived from the
andesitic magma by crystal fractionation of Hbl, Opx, or Bt, considering their
similar trace element patterns. A non-cogenetic origin (a distinct dike and
mantle source) is also possible as evolved magmas have erupted at different
locations in the area during this time period (Reyes-Guzmán et al., 2018).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study of Las
Cabras volcano allows to reconstruct its eruption. It occurred sometime between
27 to 26 kyrs BP and represents a relatively large eruption (Volcanic
Explosivity Index = 1–2; Newhall and Self, 1982), whose style evolved from
Strombolian to effusive. Early explosive activity built a large cone which
experienced a sector collapse at the end of the eruption. The collapse was
likely triggered by lava intrusion in the cone that became gravitationally
unstable due to the steep underlying slopes. The event was catastrophic,
removing a quarter of the original cone and leaving a trail of large, elongated
hummocks on the lava. The lava flow was emplaced in a valley between prominent
volcanic shields, reaching long distances (>7 km). Heavy rain during the
eruption caused syn-eruptive erosion of the early tephra, due to its fine-ash
nature and the slope on which it was deposited. This erosion probably generated
lahars, which followed the valley and might have reached the Zacapu lake shore.
Complex processes occurred in the magma conduit and feeding system, involving
mixing and mingling between distinct magma batches.
This study has
several implications for our knowledge of the factors controlling cone-forming
monogenetic volcanoes. It shows that the formation of such a volcano on a
terrain with a marked slope (>10 degrees) has strong impacts on the
stability of the volcanic edifice and the geometry of the resulting lava field.
It also evidences the erosive effect of intense rain on fine-grained tephra
fallout strata deposited on slope, which may have generated hazardous lahars.
Finally, it reveals the complex mixing and mingling processes that may occur in
the shallow magmatic plumbing system of monogenetic volcanoes, specifically in
inland areas of continental arcs. In such areas, the crust may hold abundant
stalled, cooling melts that are intersected and partly mix with new injections
of primitive mantle melts that occasionally reach the surface.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Several team
members (former and present) assisted during field work, including Pooja
Kshirsagar, Gustavo Vivó Vásquez, Oryaelle Chevrel, Balam Molina de Artola,
Juan Ramón de la Fuente and Nanci Reyes-Guzmán. We thank Américo González-Esparza,
Adriana Briseño, and Ernesto Andrade at UNAM Campus Morelia for providing
lodging facilities at the Mexican Array Radio Telescope near Coeneo during
field campaigns. Capitán Fernando Valencia is thanked for skillful and safe
flights over the study area. Reviewers Karoly Németh and Dario
Pedrazzi and journal editors Isabel Israde Alcántara and José Luis Macías were very helpful
and we are thankful for their valuable suggestions. The project was supported by
UNAM-funded projects DGAPA-PAPIIT-IN103421 to MNG and IN104221 to CS. AHJ
received a scholarship from project 152294 funded by CONACYT.
REFERENCES
Agustín-Flores, J., Siebe, C., Guilbaud, M.N., 2011, Geology and
geochemistry of Pelagatos, Cerro del Agua, and Dos Cerros monogenetic volcanoes
in the Sierra Chichinautzin volcanic field, south of Mexico City: Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 201(1-4), 143-162,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.08.010
Albert, H., Costa, F., Martí, J., 2016, Years to weeks of seismic unrest
and magmatic intrusions precede monogenetic eruptions: Geology, 44(3), 211-214.
Albert, H., Larrea, P., Costa, F., Widom, E., Siebe, C., 2020, Crystals
reveal magma convection and melt transport in dyke-fed eruptions: Scientific
Reports, 10(1), 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68421-4
Arnauld, M.C.,
Faugère-Kalfon, B., 1998, Evolución de la ocupación humana en el centro-norte
de Michoacán (Proyecto Michoacán, CEMCA) y la emergencia del Estado Tarasco. in Darras, V. (ed.), Génesis,
culturas y espacios en Michoacán: Ciudad de México, México. Centro de Estudios
Mexicanos y Centroamericanos. México, 13-34.
Ban, M., Hasenaka, T.,
Delgado Granados, H., Takaoka, N., 1992, K-Ar ages of lavas from shield
volcanoes in the Michoacán-Guanajuato volcanic field, Mexico: Geofísica
Internacional, 31, 467-473.
Becerril, L., Larrea, P., Salinas, S., Mossoux, S., Ferrés, D., Widom,
E., Siebe, C., Martí, J., 2021, The historical case of Paricutin volcano
(Michoacán, México): challenges of simulating lava flows on a gentle slope
during a long-lasting eruption: Natural Hazards, 107, 1-21,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04607-x
Blatter, D.L., Hammersley, L., 2010, Impact of the Orozco Fracture Zone
on the central Mexican Volcanic Belt: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
Research, 19781-4), 67-84.
Clark, P.U., Dyke, A.S., Shakun, J.D., Carlson, A.E., Clark, J.,
Wohlfarth, B., Mitrovica, J.X., Hostetler, S.W., McCabe, A. M., 2009, The last
glacial maximum: Science, 325(5941), 710-714.
Chevrel, M.O., Siebe, C., Guilbaud, M.N., Salinas, S., 2016, The AD 1250
El Metate shield (Michoacán): Mexico’s most voluminous Holocene eruption and
its significance for archaeology and hazards: The Holocene, 26(3), 471-488,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615609757
Connor, C.B., 1990, Cinder cone clustering in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic
Belt: implications for structural and petrologic models: Journal of Geophysical
Research Solid Earth, 95(B12), 19395-19405.
Darras, V., Mireles, C., Siebe, C., Quezada, O., Castañeda, A.,
Reyes-Guzmán, N., 2017, The other stone: Dacite quarries and workshops in the
Tarascan prehispanic territory, Michoacán, México: Journal of Archaeological
Science Reports, 12(4), 219-231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.034
Di Traglia, F., Cimarelli, C., De Rita, D., Torrente, D.G., 2009,
Changing eruptive styles in basaltic explosive volcanism: Examples from Croscat
complex scoria cone, Garrotxa Volcanic Field (NE Iberian Peninsula): Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 180(2-4), 89-109.
Dóniz-Páez, J., 2015, Volcanic geomorphological classification of the
cinder cones of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain): Geomorphology, 228, 432-447.
Folk, R.L., 1974, Petrology of sedimentary rocks: Austin, Texas,
Hemphill, 182 pp.
Forest, M. Jadot, E., Testard, J., 2019, Mazapan-style figurines at El
Palacio and their Significance for Early Postclassic regional interactions in
Northern Michoacan. Ancient Mesoamerica: Cambridge University Press, 1-20.
10.1017/S0956536119000026
Foshag, W.F., González-Reyna, J.R., 1956, Birth and development of
Paricutin volcano, Mexico: United States Geological Survey Bulletin D, 965,
355-489.
Gardine, M., West, M.E., Cox, T., 2011, Dike emplacement near Parícutin
volcano, Mexico in 2006: Bulletin of Volcanology, 73(2), 123-132.
Gómez-Vasconcelos, M.G., Avellán, D.R., Soria-Caballero, D., Macías,
J.L., Velázquez-Bucio, M.M., Jiménez-Haro, A., Israde-Alcántara, I.,
Garduño-Monroy, V.H., Ávila-Olivera, J.A., Figueroa-Soto, A., Cisneros-Máximo,
G., Cardona-Melchor, S., 2021, Geomorphic characterization of faults as
earthquake sources in the Cuitzeo Lake basin, central México: Journal of South
American Earth Sciences, 103196, https//doi.org/10-1016/j.jsames.2021.103196
Guilbaud, M.N., Self, S., Thordarson, T., Blake, S., 2005, Morphology,
surface structures, and emplacement of lavas produced by Laki, AD 1783–1784:
Geological Society of America Special Papers, 396, 81-102.
Guilbaud, M.-N., Siebe, C., Salinas, S., 2009, Excursions to Paricutin
and Jorullo (Michoacán), the youngest volcanoes of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic
Belt: Impretei, México D.F., 31 pp.
Guilbaud, M.-N., Siebe, C., Layer, P., Salinas, S., Castro-Govea, R.,
Garduño-Monroy, V.H., Le Corvec, N., 2011, Geology, geochronology, and tectonic
setting of the Jorullo volcano region, Michoacán, México: Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 201, 97-112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.09.005
Guilbaud, M.-N., Siebe, C., Layer, P., Salinas, S., 2012, Reconstruction
of the volcanic history of the Tacámbaro-Puruarán area (Michoacán, México)
reveals high frequency of Holocene monogenetic eruptions: Bulletin of
Volcanology, 74, 1187-1211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0594-0
Guilbaud, M.-N., Siebe, C., Rasoazanamparany, C., Widom, E., Salinas,
S., Castro Govea, R., 2019, Petrographic, Geochemical and Isotopic
(Sr–Nd–Pb–Os) Study of Plio-Quaternary Volcanics and the Tertiary Basement in
the Jorullo-Tacámbaro Area, Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field, Mexico:
Journal of Petrology, 60(12), 2317-2338, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egaa006
Gutmann, J.T., 1979, Structure and eruptive cycle of cinder cones in the
Pinacate volcanic field and the controls of Strombolian activity: The Journal
of Geology, 87(4), 448-454.
Hasenaka, T., Carmichael, I.S.E., 1985, The cinder cones of
Michoacán-Guanajuato, central Mexico: their age, volume and distribution, and
magma discharge rate: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 25,
105-124.
Hasenaka, T., 1994, Size, distribution, and magma output rate for shield
volcanoes of the Michoacán-Guanajuato volcanic field, Central Mexico: Journal
of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 63(1-2), 13-31.
Hasenaka, T., Carmichael, I.S.E., 1987, The cinder cones of
Michoacán-Guanajuato, central Mexico: Petrology and chemistry: Journal of
Petrology, 28, 241-269.
Hernández Jiménez, A.,
2016, El Volcán Las Cabras, Cuenca de Zacapu, Michoacán, México: Edad, historia
eruptiva y composicion química: Mexico City, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Undergraduate thesis, 92 pp.
Holm, R.F., 1987, Significance of agglutinate mounds on lava flows
associated with monogenetic cones: An example at Sunset Crater, northern
Arizona: Geological Society of America Bulletin, 99(3), 319-324.
Hopkins, J.L., Smid, E.R., Eccles, J.D., Hayes, J.L., Hayward, B.W.,
McGee, L.E., van Wijk, K., Wilson, T.M., Cronin, S.J., Leonard, G.S., Lindsay,
J.M., Németh, K., Smith, I.E., 2020, Auckland Volcanic Field magmatism,
volcanism, and hazard: a review: New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics,
1-22, DOI:10.1080/00288306.2020.1736102
Houghton, B.F., Bonadonna, C., Gregg, C.E., Johnston, D.M., Cousins,
W.J., Cole, J.W., Del Carlo, P., 2006, Proximal tephra hazards: Recent eruption
studies applied to volcanic risk in the Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand:
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 155(1-2), 138-149.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional
de Estadística, Geografía e Informática), 2016, Modelos digitales de elevación
tipo terreno con 5 m de resolución, E14A11D1; E14A11D2;
E14A11D3; E14A11D4; E14A11E1; E14A11E2; E14A11E3; E14A11E4; E14A11F1 y
E14A11F3, escala 1:10,000: México.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional
de Estadística, Geografía e Informática), 2020, Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020: Ciudad de México, México.
Jankovics, M.É., Sági, T., Astbury, R.L., Petrelli, M., Kiss, B., Ubide,
T., Németh, K., Ntaflos, T., Harangi, S., 2019, Olivine major and trace element
compositions coupled with spinel chemistry to unravel the magmatic systems
feeding monogenetic basaltic volcanoes: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
Research, 369, 203-223.
Johnson, E.R., Wallace, P.J., Cashman, K.V., Granados, H.D., Kent, A.J.,
2008, Magmatic volatile contents and degassing-induced crystallization at
Volcán Jorullo, Mexico: Implications for melt evolution and the plumbing
systems of monogenetic volcanoes: Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
269(3-4), 478-487.
Johnson, E.R., Wallace, P.J., Cashman, K.V., Granados, H.D., 2010, Degassing
of volatiles (H2O, CO2, S, Cl) during ascent, crystallization, and eruption at mafic
monogenetic volcanoes in central Mexico: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
Research, 197(1-4), 225-238.
Kereszturi, G., Jordan, G., Németh, K., Dóniz-Páez, J.F., 2012,
Syn-eruptive morphometric variability of monogenetic scoria cones: Bulletin of
Volcanology, 74(9), 2171-2185.
Krauskopf, K.B., 1948, Mechanism of eruption at Paricutin volcano,
Mexico: Geological Society of America Bulletin, 59(8), 711-732.
Kshirsagar, P., Siebe, C., Guilbaud, M.N., Salinas, S., Layer, P.W.,
2015, Late Pleistocene Alberca de Guadalupe maar volcano (Zacapu basin,
Michoacán): Stratigraphy, tectonic setting, and paleo-hydrogeological
environment: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 304, 214-236,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.09.003
Kshirsagar, P., Siebe, C., Guilbaud, M.N., Salinas, S., 2016, Geological
and environmental controls on the change of eruptive style (phreatomagmatic to
Strombolian-effusive) of Late Pleistocene El Caracol tuff cone and its
comparison with adjacent volcanoes around the Zacapu basin (Michoacán, México):
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 318, 114-133,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.03.015
Larrea, P., Salinas, S., Widom, E., Siebe, C., Abbitt, R.J., 2017,
Compositional and volumetric development of a monogenetic lava flow field: The
historical case of Paricutin (Michoacán, Mexico): Journal of Volcanology and
Geothermal Research, 348, 36-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.10.016
Larrea, P., Widom, E., Siebe, C. Salinas, S., Kuentz, D., 2019a, A
re-interpretation of the petrogenesis of Paricutin volcano: Distinguishing crustal
contamination from mantle heterogeneity: Chemical Geology, 504, 66-82,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.10.026
Larrea, P., Siebe, C., Juárez-Arriaga, E., Salinas, S., Ibarra, H.,
Böhnel, H., 2019b, The ~AD 500-700 (Late Classic) El Astillero and El Pedregal
volcanoes (Michoacán, Mexico): a new monogenetic cluster in the making?:
Bulletin of Volcanology, 81(10), 59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-019-1318-5
Larrea, P., Albert, H., Ubide, T., Costa, F., Colás, V., Widom, E.,
Siebe, C., 2021, From explosive vent opening to effusive outpouring: mineral
constraints on magma dynamics and timescales at Paricutin monogenetic volcano:
Journal of Petrology, egaa112, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egaa112
Lorenzo-Merino, A., Guilbaud, M.N., Roberge, J., 2018, The violent
Strombolian eruption of 10 ka Pelado shield volcano, Sierra Chichinautzin,
Central Mexico: Bulletin of Volcanology, 80(3), 1-17.
Losantos, E., Cebriá, J.M., Morán-Zenteno, D.J., Martiny, B.M.,
López-Ruiz, J., Solís-Pichardo, G., 2017, Petrogenesis of the alkaline and
calcalkaline monogenetic volcanism in the northern sector of the
Michoacán-Guanajuato Volcanic Field (Central Mexico): Lithos, 288, 295-310.
Luhr, J.F., Carmichael, I.S.E., 1985, Jorullo Volcano, Michoacán, Mexico
(1759–1774): the earliest stages of fractionation in calc-alkaline magmas:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 90, 142-161.
Luhr, J.F., Simkin, T., 1993, Parícutin: the volcano born in a Mexican
cornfield: Phoenix, Arizona, Geoscience Press, 427 pp.
Macías, J.L., Arce, J.L., 2019, Volcanic activity in Mexico during the
Holocene, in The Holocene and Anthropocene Environmental History of Mexico:
Switzerland, Springer Verlag, 129-170.
Mahgoub, A.N., Böhnel, H., Siebe, C., Salinas, S., Guilbaud, M.N., 2017,
Paleomagnetically inferred ages of a cluster of Holocene monogenetic eruptions
in the Tacámbaro-Puruarán area (Michoacán, Mexico): Implications for future
hazards: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 347, 360-370,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.10.004
Mahgoub, A.N., Reyes-Guzmán, N., Böhnel, H., Siebe, C., Pereira, G.,
Dorison, A., 2018, Paleomagnetic constraints on the ages of the Holocene
Malpaís de Zacapu lava flow eruptions, Michoacán (Mexico): implications for
archeology and volcanic hazards: The Holocene, 28(2), 229-245,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617721323
Martin, U., Németh, K., 2006, How Strombolian is a “Strombolian” scoria
cone? Some irregularities in scoria cone architecture from the Transmexican
Volcanic Belt, near Volcán Ceboruco (Mexico) and Al Haruj (Libya): Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 155(1-2), 104-118.
Mannen, K., Ito, T., 2007, Formation of scoria cone during explosive
eruption at Izu‐Oshima volcano, Japan: Geophysical Research Letters, 34(18),
1-5.
McBirney, A.R., Taylor, H.P., Armstrong, R.L., 1987, Paricutin
re-examined: a classic example of crustal assimilation in calc-alkaline magma:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 95(1), 4-20.
Michelet, D., Arnauld,
M.C., Fauvet-Berthelot, M.F., 1989, El Proyecto del CEMCA en Michoacán. Etapa
I. Un balance: TRACE, 16, 70-87.
Migeon, G., 1998, El
poblamiento del Malpaís de Zacapu y de sus alrededores del Clásico al
Posclásico, in Darras, V. (ed.) Génesis, culturas y espacios en Michoacán: México,
Centro de estudios mexicanos y centroamericanos (CEMCA), 36-45,
https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cemca.3395.
Murcia, H., Németh, K.,
El-Masry, N.N., Lindsay, J.M., Moufti, M.R.H., Wameyo, P., Cronin, S.J., Smith,
I.E.M, Kereszturi, G., 2015, The Al-Du’aythah volcanic cones, Al-Madinah City:
implications for volcanic hazards in northern Harrat Rahat, Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia: Bulletin of Volcanology, 77(6), 54, 1-19.
Németh, K., Risso, C., Nullo, F., Kereszturi, G., 2011, The role of
collapsing and cone rafting on eruption style changes and final cone
morphology: Los Morados scoria cone, Mendoza, Argentina: Central European
Journal of Geosciences, 3(2), 102-118.
Newhall, C.G., Self, S., 1982, The volcanic explosivity index (VEI) an
estimate of explosive magnitude for historical volcanism: Journal of
Geophysical Research: Oceans, 87(C2), 1231-1238.
Noriega E., Noriega, A.,
1923, La desecación de la ciénega de Zacapu y las leyes agrarias. Caso
especial, único en el país: México, Archivo General de la Nación, 58 pp.
Ordóñez, E., 1947, El
volcán Paricutín: México: Ciudad de México, México, Editorial Fantasía, 181 pp.
Ort, M.H., Elson, M.D., Anderson, K.C., Duffield, W.A., Hooten, J.A.,
Champion, D.E., Waring, G., 2008, Effects of scoria-cone eruptions upon nearby
human communities: Geological Society of America Bulletin, 120(3-4), 476-486.
Osorio-Ocampo, S., Macías, J.L., Pola, A., Cardona-Melchor, S.,
Sosa-Ceballos, G., Garduño-Monroy, V.H., Layer, P.W., García-Sánchez, L.,
Perton, M., Benowitz, J., 2018, The eruptive history of the Pátzcuaro Lake area
in the Michoacán Guanajuato Volcanic Field, central México: Field mapping, C-14
and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology: Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 358, 307-328.
Pacheco, J.F., Valdés-González, C., Delgado, H., Singh, S.K., Zuñiga,
F.R., Mortera-Gutiérrez, C.A., Santoyo, M.A., Domínguez, J., Barrón, R., 1999,
Tectonic implications of the earthquake swarm of 1997 in the Michoacan
Triangle, Mexico: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 12(6), 567-577.
Pereira, G., Forest, M., Jadot, E., Darras, V., 2021, Ephemeral cities?
The longevity of the Postclassic Tarascan urban sites of Zacapu Malpaís and its
consequences on the migration process, in Arnauld, M.C., Beekman, C.,
Pereira, G., (eds.) Mobility and Migration in Ancient Mesoamerican Cities:
Boulder, CO, USA, University Press of Colorado, 208-231.
Pioli, L., Erlund, E., Johnson, E., Cashman, K., Wallace, P., Rosi, M.,
Granados, H.D., 2008, Explosive dynamics of violent Strombolian eruptions: the
eruption of Parícutin Volcano 1943–1952 (Mexico): Earth and Planetary Science
Letters, 271(1-4), 359-368.
Pioli, L., Azzopardi, B.J., Cashman, K.V., 2009, Controls on the
explosivity of scoria cone eruptions: Magma segregation at conduit junctions:
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 186(3-4), 407-415.
Porter, S. C., 1972, Distribution, morphology, and size frequency of
cinder cones on Mauna Kea volcano, Hawaii: Geological Society of America
Bulletin, 83(12), 3607-3612.
Ramírez-Uribe, I., Siebe, C., Salinas, S., Guilbaud, M.N., Layer, P.,
Benowitz, J., 2019, 14C and 40Ar/39Ar radiometric dating and geologic setting of young lavas of Rancho Seco
and Mazcuta volcanoes hosting archaeological sites at the margins of the
Pátzcuaro and Zacapu lake basins (central Michoacán, Mexico): Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 388, 106674, 1-22,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106674
Ramírez-Uribe, I., Siebe, C., Chevrel, M.O., Fisher, C.T., 2021, Rancho
Seco monogenetic volcano (Michoacán, Mexico): Petrogenesis and lava flow
emplacement based on LiDAR images. Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol. 411, p. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.107169
Rasoazanamparany, C., Widom, E., Siebe, C., Guilbaud, M.N., Spicuzza,
M.J., Valley, J.W., Valdés, G., Salinas, S., 2016, Temporal and compositional evolution
of Jorullo volcano, Mexico: Implications for magmatic processes associated with
a monogenetic eruption: Chemical Geology, 434, 62-80,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.04.004
Reyes-Guzmán, N., 2017,
Geología volcánica de la región occidental de la cuenca lacustre de Zacapu,
Michoacán y su importancia para la arqueología: Mexico City, Mexico, Facultad
de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Bachelor Thesis,113 pp.
Reyes-Guzmán, N., Siebe, C., Chevrel, M.O., Guilbaud, M.N., Salinas, S.,
Layer, P., 2018, Geology and radiometric dating of Quaternary monogenetic
volcanism in the western Zacapu lacustrine basin (Michoacán, México):
implications for archeology and future hazard evaluations: Bulletin of
Volcanology, 80(2), 18, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1193-5
Reyes-Guzmán, N., Siebe,
C., Chevrel, O.M., Pereira, G., 2021. Late Holocene
Malpaís de Zacapu (Michoacán, Mexico) andesitic lava flows: Rheology and
eruption properties based on LiDAR image: Bulletin of Volcanology, 83, 28,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01449-0
Riggs, N.R., Duffield, W.A., 2008, Record of complex scoria cone
eruptive activity at Red Mountain, Arizona, USA, and implications for
monogenetic mafic volcanoes: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,
178(4), 763-776.
Romero, C., Galindo, I., Sánchez, N., Martín-González, E., Vegas, J.,
2021, Syn-Eruptive Lateral Collapse of Monogenetic Volcanoes: The Case of Mazo
Volcano from the Timanfaya Eruption (Lanzarote, Canary Islands), in Updates in Volcanology -
Transdisciplinary Nature of Volcano Science: Intech Open,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93882 (Online first)
Rowe, M.C., Peate, D.W., Ukstins Peate, I., 2011, An investigation into
the nature of the magmatic plumbing system at Paricutin Volcano,
Mexico: Journal of Petrology, 52(11), 2187-2220.
Rowland, S.K., Jurado-Chichay, Z., Ernst, G., Walker, G.P.L., 2009,
Pyroclastic deposits and lava flows from the 1759-1774 eruption of El Jorullo,
México: aspects of ‘violent Strombolian' activity: Studies in
volcanology: the legacy of George Walker: Geological Society of London, Special
Publications of IAVCEI, 2, 105-128.
Scott, D.H., Trask, N.J., 1971, Geology of the lunar crater volcanic
field, Nye County, Nevada: United States Geological Survey (USGS), Professional
Paper 599-I, 15 pp.
Segerstrom, K., 1950, Erosion studies at Paricutin, state of Michoacán,
Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 965-A, 1-164.
Settle, M.A., 1979, The structure and emplacement of cinder cone fields:
American Journal of Science, 279(10), 1089-1107.
Siebe, C., Macías, J.L., 2006, Volcanic hazards in the Mexico City
metropolitan area from eruptions at Popocatépetl, Nevado de Toluca, and
Jocotitlán stratovolcanoes and monogenetic scoria cones in the Sierra
Chichinautzin Volcanic Field: Special Papers-Geological Society of America,
402, 253-329.
SSN (Servicio Sismológico
Nacional), 2020, Reporte especial Secuencia sísmica del 5 de enero al 10 de
marzo de 2020 Michoacan (M 4.1): Ciudad de México, Mexico, Instituto de Geofísica,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, URL: http://www.ssn.unam.mx, query
date: january 2021.
Siebe, C., Guilbaud, M.N.,
Salinas, S., Kshirsagar, P., Chevrel, M.O., De la Fuente, J.R.,
Hernández-Jiménez, A., Godínez, L., 2014, Monogenetic volcanism of the
Michoacán-Guanajuato volcanic field: Maar craters of the Zacapu basin and
domes, shields, and scoria cones of the Tarascan highland (Paracho-Paricutin
región, in Field guide, Pre-meeting
Fieldtrip for the 5th International Maar Conference (5IMC-IAVCEI):
Querétaro, Mexico, 33 pp.
Suter, M., Quintero, O., Johnson, C.A., 1992, Active faults and state of
stress in the central part of the Trans‐Mexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico 1. The
Venta de Bravo Fault: Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 97(B8),
11983-11993.
Suter, M., López-Martínez, M., Quintero-Legorreta, O.,
Carrillo-Martínez, M., 2001, Quaternary intra-arc extension in the central
Trans-Mexican volcanic belt: Bulletin of the Geological Society of America,
113(6), 693-703,
https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0693:QIAEIT>2.0.CO;2
Taddeucci, J., Pompilio, M., Scarlato, P., 2004, Conduit processes
during the July–August 2001 explosive activity of Mt. Etna (Italy): inferences
from glass chemistry and crystal size distribution of ash particles: Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 137(1-3), 33-54.
Takada, A., 1994, The influence of regional stress and magmatic input on
styles of monogenetic and polygenetic volcanism: Journal of Geophysical
Research Solid Earth, 99(B7), 13563-13573.
Tibaldi, A., 1995, Morphology of pyroclastic cones and tectonics:
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 100(B12), 24521-24535.
Valentine, G.A., Gregg, T.K.P., 2008, Continental basaltic
volcanoes—processes and problems: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
Research, 177(4), 857-873.
Valentine, G.A., Keating, G.N., 2007, Eruptive styles and inferences
about plumbing systems at Hidden Cone and Little Black Peak scoria cone
volcanoes (Nevada, USA): Bulletin of Volcanology, 70(1), 105-113.
Valentine, G. A., Perry, F. V., Krier, D., Keating, G. N., Kelley, R.
E., Cogbill, A. H., 2006, Small-volume basaltic volcanoes: Eruptive products
and processes, and posteruptive geomorphic evolution in Crater Flat
(Pleistocene), southern Nevada: Geological Society of America Bulletin,
118(11-12), 1313-1330.
Valentine, G.A., Krier, D.J., Perry, F.V., Heiken, G., 2007, Eruptive
and geomorphic processes at the Lathrop Wells scoria cone volcano: Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 161(1-2), 57-80.
Younger, Z.P., Valentine, G.A., Gregg, T.K.P, 2019, ‘A’ā lava
emplacement and the significance of rafted pyroclastic material: Marcath
volcano (Nevada, USA): Bulletin of Volcanology, 81, 50, https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1007/s00445-019-1309-6.